←back to thread

1783 points zaggynl | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.582s | source | bottom
Show context
ddevault ◴[] No.23223542[source]
Google & YouTube employees on HN: how do you justify still working at this company? Enough of the cognitive dissonance. Face your choices and tell me how you square yourself with them. For shame.
replies(30): >>23223599 #>>23223644 #>>23223678 #>>23223691 #>>23223692 #>>23223698 #>>23223717 #>>23223748 #>>23223771 #>>23223776 #>>23223779 #>>23223805 #>>23223873 #>>23223923 #>>23223946 #>>23223948 #>>23223951 #>>23223984 #>>23224027 #>>23224165 #>>23224204 #>>23224226 #>>23224276 #>>23224278 #>>23224408 #>>23225345 #>>23225509 #>>23225665 #>>23225802 #>>23229128 #
virvar ◴[] No.23223771[source]
How do you buy hardware? I’m genuinely asking because where I live it’s impossible to buy stuff that wasn’t made in China.

It’s almost impossible to lead en ethical life in this day and age if you do anything related to tech.

replies(4): >>23223806 #>>23223837 #>>23224043 #>>23224336 #
1. bradly ◴[] No.23224043[source]
> It’s almost impossible to lead en ethical life in this day and age if you do anything related to tech.

That doesn't change that an engineer in the bay area can choose to work for Google or choose to find an alternative place of employment. People can choose more ethical choices without living in a pure ethical panacea.

replies(1): >>23224368 #
2. shadowgovt ◴[] No.23224368[source]
Sure, but then we're back to "What mental gymnastics do techies do to justify buying hardware they know is made in sweatshop conditions in China?"

Take that template and apply it to Googlers. There is no ethical consumption under capitalism; everyone has compromised a rigid belief structure somewhere.

replies(1): >>23225262 #
3. bradly ◴[] No.23225262[source]
I don't think it has to be mental gymnastics, but you are right that it is a real challenge.

I think people (especially those in privileged positions like engs in the bay area) should feel empowered to think and decide their line as to what they want to support and contribute to the world.

replies(1): >>23226229 #
4. bradlys ◴[] No.23226229{3}[source]
Hey alter-me, it's a nice thought. But, realistically, many people are faced with living a subpar life in the bay area (rent small apartments for the rest of your life) or working for a big corp and living a better life (own a home - can afford many things). It's not like these people are going to find a company that is perfectly ethical on every side while also still paying $400k+/yr for senior software engineers.

A lot of engineers are wage slaves as much as anyone else. It's not like everyone wants to do this stuff.

EDIT: On a more personal note - I hope your name is actually "Bradly" and you're not "Bradley". And that you actually go by that in real life instead of "Brad". As I know there's some "Brad"s out there that like to buy up Bradly variations without actually going by it. It's killing me.

replies(1): >>23226922 #
5. bradly ◴[] No.23226922{4}[source]
I agree with you, I just think some big corps are worse than others, so I choose one that is on the better end of big-evil-corp. Is the pay that much worse at Stripe, Square, GitHub, Netflix than advertising companies?

--

Yes, I am a Bradly. About half my coworkers/friends/family call me Bradly and about half call me Brad. I introduce my self as both interchangeably depending on the situation.

replies(1): >>23227993 #
6. bradlys ◴[] No.23227993{5}[source]
I don't know if those companies could take on every engineer leaving a supposedly morally lesser company - which employs many more people.

My point is - not everyone has a choice. You might get the pick of the litter but there are many people who are lucky if they even get one offer from a company paying $400k+/yr. And - for reference - I am one of the people who has never received an offer from one. All my offers have been under $200k/yr (that doesn't include that I have to pay over $2,000/month to buy options that will "maybe one day if we're all lucky" pan out for something).

The world of living in silicon valley under $200k/yr vs $400k+/yr is wildly different. One feels like you're no better off than a retail worker and the other feels like you're a working class professional.