←back to thread

1525 points garyclarke27 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
kleiba ◴[] No.23219907[source]
I've never lived in China but this immediately sounds like my (naive) idea of what it must be like: you're only allowed to consume what the government has approved.

I think this is setting a dangerous precedence.

replies(3): >>23219936 #>>23220090 #>>23220341 #
weiming ◴[] No.23219936[source]
Except in this case it's not the government, but private corporations taking some kind of political stance.

Google in particular has been very "active," not to forget also: https://www.businessinsider.com/youtube-will-ban-anything-ag... ("video that 'goes against' WHO guidance on the pandemic will be blocked")

replies(3): >>23220012 #>>23220511 #>>23223162 #
1. ravenstine ◴[] No.23223162[source]
What is a government but a "corporation" that owns land and takes a political stance? I find Google to be virtually indistinguishable from government besides that it doesn't have a constitution. Even worse is that they have contracts with the US and various governments, making them a political toady.