←back to thread

1525 points garyclarke27 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.32s | source
Show context
bbarn ◴[] No.23219613[source]
COVID-19 is the terrorism of this generation. It's the anything goes, doesn't matter how fair, as long as it's because COVID.
replies(3): >>23219798 #>>23219814 #>>23220435 #
switch007 ◴[] No.23219814[source]
I agree.

It’s badly affected air travel and who knows what changes will result (or what contracts for pointless bio-security theatre have been made)

In the UK, a 300+ page law was basically pre-written and enacted very quickly, reminiscent of the early anti terrorism law.

We have set up a bio security unit, currently headed by the security services.

UK has a “threat level” system for coronavirus similar to the terror threat level.

The government talk about it in threatening terms such as it being everywhere and it not going away.

If you are against measures you can easily be accused of wanting old people to die.

The UK was absolutely petrified of it at the beginning shown by the very successful self policed lockdown.

Definitely some similarities

replies(2): >>23219916 #>>23220214 #
solarkraft ◴[] No.23219916[source]
Do you think it's unjustified? Other countries have acted much more quickly and saved lots of lives.
replies(3): >>23220092 #>>23220136 #>>23220750 #
chippy ◴[] No.23220750[source]
One can equally say the PATRIOT act was justified and saved lives. Many people here agreed with that for years until Snowden etc revealed that it was unjustified.
replies(1): >>23220812 #
1. dragonwriter ◴[] No.23220812[source]
> One can equally say the PATRIOT act was justified and saved lives.

No, there's plenty of public evidence that lockdowns reduce the spread of COVID-19 and save lives; that's not true for the PATRIOT Act. So this is false, as well as being a red herring...

> Many people here agreed with that for years until Snowden etc revealed that it was unjustified.

I don't think that Snowden and other whistleblowers revealed that the PATRIOT Act was unjustified so much as that what was actually authorized by the PATRIOT Act was a drop in the bucket to what the US government was actually doing in surveillance.

The proximate result of which was Congress expanding surveillance authority to legalize much of what had been being done illegally (authority it is currently in the process of renewing), so clearly it's not even a universal conclusion, even now, that the unauthorized surveillance they revealed was unjustified.