←back to thread

215 points LaSombra | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.466s | source
Show context
3fe9a03ccd14ca5 ◴[] No.23080583[source]
> This is why I hold my peers accountable for working at companies which are making a negative impact on the world around them.

Oh these are the rules now? Judging other people is easy. You can look at almost anyone and find something you don’t like about them: sweatshop sneakers, ignorance of their history, consumer waste, eating meat from commercial farms... don’t you know people around the world are starving and you’re throwing out food?

Finding faults in others is easy and helps change exactly nothing. Turning it inward in self examination is the hard part.

replies(1): >>23080628 #
ddevault ◴[] No.23080628[source]
There's a pretty damn big difference between throwing out $5 of food while someone across the Earth starves, and in directly making the software which opresses millions of people, raising millions of dollars for the people responsible, and pocketing huge salaries for yourself.

>As a general rule, it costs a business your salary × 1.5 to employ you, given the overhead of benefits, HR, training, and so on. When you’re making a cool half-million annual salary from $bigcorp, it’s because they expect to make at least ¾ of a million that they wouldn’t be making without you. It does not make economic sense for them to hire you if this weren’t the case.

replies(2): >>23081043 #>>23081353 #
1. matchbok ◴[] No.23081353[source]
Oppresses millions? Please, if you are going to try to make that argument, spare us the hyperbole.
replies(1): >>23081547 #
2. ddevault ◴[] No.23081547[source]
The extensive use of lobbying to disenfranchise voters in favor of corporate agendas alone oppresses millions of people. This is no hyperbole.