←back to thread

376 points undefined1 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.359s | source
Show context
umvi ◴[] No.22974956[source]
This is obviously a controversial topic, and I have mixed feelings.

The bottom line (for me) is that diversity at universities and other organizations is either good, neutral, or bad. We've (mostly?) collectively agreed diversity is good as diversity in sex/age/race bring diversity in thought, which presumably results in more innovation/competition/challenging of status quo/etc. The only way to increase diversity is to practice negative discrimination on dominant groups or positive discrimination on minorities...

Either that or universities need to dedicate a large amount of funding marketing to minorities so that they get more competitive applicants from said group. However, discrimination is easier and cheaper to implement.

replies(6): >>22974967 #>>22974995 #>>22975014 #>>22975040 #>>22975116 #>>22975133 #
skybrian ◴[] No.22974967[source]
I think Harvard should be 10x bigger than it is. Why can't we have that? This needn't be zero-sum.
replies(5): >>22974985 #>>22975008 #>>22975012 #>>22975013 #>>22975787 #
1. BadassFractal ◴[] No.22975787[source]
Same reason why clubs want to be exclusive and keep a long line of non-VIPs outside waiting to get in.