←back to thread

721 points hhs | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.301s | source
Show context
JaakkoP ◴[] No.22889999[source]
I love the quote from John Collison:

"This is digital migration in a very compressed period of time, for both businesses and customers," Collison adds. "My mom recently asked me if I'd heard of 'this Instacart thing.' Yeah mom, I have."

replies(3): >>22890070 #>>22890098 #>>22890270 #
tlrobinson ◴[] No.22890270[source]
Sadly, it’s also likely one of the largest and fastest transfers of wealth from small businesses to large corporations. As Amazon hires 100,000+ workers how many small businesses are shuttering for good?

Stripe is one of the “good” tech companies in this respect by helping to level the playing field for smaller businesses, but it’s not going to be enough.

replies(4): >>22890362 #>>22890426 #>>22890848 #>>22894468 #
malandrew ◴[] No.22890426[source]
I don't understand this idolization of small over large (or vice versa for others). The thing that matters most is that businesses best satisfy their customers, whether they are small or large.

There's no benefit to having a small business that provides inferior products or inferior service relative to a large company.

I buy from small companies all the time and many of those that I do will likely survive because they provide better goods and services than any large company.

replies(5): >>22890510 #>>22890583 #>>22890920 #>>22891459 #>>22891891 #
core-questions ◴[] No.22890583[source]
> There's no benefit to having a small business that provides inferior products or inferior service relative to a large company.

Sure there is - in terms of where the profit goes. The profit in a small business goes to the owner(s), who usually live somewhere in the local community, and in turn that money stays within the community to be spent on other businesses there.

When a Walmart comes along, the profits all move up the chain to a corporation that is nowhere nearby, effectively sucking the wealth out of small towns in exchange for slightly reduced costs thanks to efficient logistics.

The happy medium would be to find a way to have logistics as good as Walmart without having to actually be Walmart.

replies(6): >>22890883 #>>22890901 #>>22891168 #>>22891512 #>>22891668 #>>22893328 #
asdfadsfgfdda ◴[] No.22891168[source]
By that logic, car dealerships in America are a positive because they keep profits locally. In reality, they just increase prices to consumers and limit competition through lobbying.

The cost advantage from Walmart is not just in logistics, it is specialization of labor, superior negotiating power against suppliers, and diversification of geographic risk. A small business will be less efficient and give up more profits to suppliers.

replies(1): >>22891664 #
1. eloff ◴[] No.22891664[source]
This is true, but are lower prices for consumers better for everyone in the community than keeping the profits locally? I don't think anyone knows. My guess is it creates different winners and losers.