←back to thread

1298 points jgrahamc | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
billti ◴[] No.22879807[source]
> The neurologists delivered their verdict: He appeared to have a textbook case of frontotemporal dementia—known by the shorthand FTD

Oh man, was that a kick in the guts when I got to that bit. My Dad was diagnosed with that in the past year, (after obviously struggling for a while), and declined rapidly. He had a different variant, and indeed the one thing that DIDN'T change was his personality. In fact, that's what kind of fooled me for a while. He would still trot out his usual bad jokes and regular phrases, but after a while you realize these are almost like reflexes, and often wouldn't really make sense in context.

It was interesting to see for Lee how this seemed amplified after heart surgery. My Dad had really bad "post-operative delirium" for about a month after major heart surgery, and while he recovered somewhat, that was definitely the start of his major decline.

Sadly, after moving into a care facility in mid-March, within a couple weeks he was in hospital after contracting Covid-19. He passed away on the 4th of this month from it. The only good to come out of all this was that I'd visited him many times over the past couple years and said "goodbye" many times thinking it might be the last time, even if just mentally and not physically, I'd get to see "my Dad", as I knew him.

Apparently it is often a genetic disorder that can be hereditary, and you can get tested for the genetic markers. As a coder/manager myself who depends on my mind for work, and enjoys being mentally challenged and active, (and I also have young kids), something like this scares the crap out of me. I'm not sure I want to know if I might have it. For one thing, being in the U.S. healthcare system, if I did have the markers, would that then count as a "pre-existing condition" I'd have to disclose?

replies(8): >>22879926 #>>22879960 #>>22880784 #>>22880878 #>>22882366 #>>22882671 #>>22883431 #>>22890188 #
Retric ◴[] No.22880878[source]
FYI, preexisting conditions stopped being a major issue with heath insurance after the Affordable Care Act (Obama Care) got passed: https://www.policygenius.com/health-insurance/pre-existing-c...

Insurers cannot deny health coverage, cannot charge higher costs, or subject people with pre-existing conditions to a waiting period

You may be better off getting life/long term care insurance before getting tested, but other than that there is little reason to avoid being tested.

replies(1): >>22881126 #
1. tcoff91 ◴[] No.22881126[source]
I don't know if we can count on the ACA staying around forever.
replies(1): >>22881278 #
2. Retric ◴[] No.22881278[source]
It survived both political parties in power. It might get chipped away over the next 30 years or replaced with public option etc, but bringing back the preexisting condition issue would be extremely unpopular. Also, it does not actually cost insurance companies much money as they can all just raise premiums.
replies(1): >>22882107 #
3. Agathos ◴[] No.22882107[source]
So you're confident that the Supreme Court will overturn the 5th Circuit's decision to throw it out? The Supreme Court will be hearing the case this autumn.

And you must be confident that Trump will lose, since the 5-4 majority that saved Obamacare last time will not survive a few more Republican appointments.

replies(2): >>22883075 #>>22887909 #
4. Retric ◴[] No.22883075{3}[source]
In terms of appointments, republicans have had control of the Supreme Court for years. In terms of the actual judges and their rulings that’s anybody’s guess. They could easily remove the tax while keeping the rest of the law unchanged or do just about anything.
replies(1): >>22888565 #
5. masonic ◴[] No.22887909{3}[source]

  the 5-4 majority that saved Obamacare last time will not survive a few more Republican appointments
You seem unaware that Chief Justice Roberts authored the opinion upholding ACA.
replies(1): >>22888545 #
6. Agathos ◴[] No.22888545{4}[source]
So what? The Chief Justice can write the minority opinion next time. That 5-seat majority includes some who will almost certainly retire in the next four years.
7. Agathos ◴[] No.22888565{4}[source]
I don't really know what to make of "republicans have had control of the Supreme Court for years." Overturning Obamacare was their number one priority during the Obama administration. The Supreme Court chose not to. The five justices who chose not to are still seated. Some control.
replies(1): >>22890282 #
8. Retric ◴[] No.22890282{5}[source]
Scalia and Kennedy where both republican appointments and replaced with Republican appointments. So if you’re saying they have 5-4 control now they also had 5-4 control then.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_justices_of_the_Suprem...

That said, many justices have not voted as expected. In other cases political parties have swapped positions on various issues etc.