←back to thread

265 points ajaviaad | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chvid ◴[] No.22760237[source]
I thought here in the west that it was well-established that temperature checks and mask do not work against the corona?!
replies(8): >>22760273 #>>22760292 #>>22760320 #>>22760373 #>>22760375 #>>22760387 #>>22760433 #>>22761127 #
amiga_500 ◴[] No.22760320[source]
I have a hard time believing that everyone wearing a mask when interacting doesn't inhibit a disease transmitted via vapor in our breath.
replies(2): >>22760484 #>>22761901 #
btilly ◴[] No.22760484[source]
There is actually a debate about this.

A bad mask (eg a bandanna) means less virus gets out, but it is more likely to get out in the form of a fine aerosol that hangs in the air for hours. On the opposite end it is a reminder not to touch your face (prevents transmission from your hands) but won't stop you from breathing in an aerosol.

Likely still a net win, but kinda a hard thing to do good research on.

There is no doubt that masks that are designed to block things the size of viruses help. Just issues about who is the highest priority to get them when they are in short supply.

replies(4): >>22760549 #>>22760639 #>>22760714 #>>22760720 #
Ensorceled ◴[] No.22760720{3}[source]
Who is debating this? I haven't seen a reliable "con" side of this debate, they are all weird "people will take less care", "cloth masks are not as good as N95", "people will wear them poorly and the mask won't be as effective".

These are all "perfect is the enemy of good" fallacies, not "debate".

Also, how does a bad mask increase aerosol? That makes no sense.

replies(1): >>22761751 #
1. btilly ◴[] No.22761751{4}[source]
See http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentar... for a reliable "con" side of the debate.

Note in particular that cloth masks were tried and failed during the Spanish flu epidemic.