←back to thread

265 points ajaviaad | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.276s | source
Show context
axaxs ◴[] No.22760900[source]
How are temperature checks useful? I thought I'd read that people are asymptomatic for up to 2 weeks, during which time they can spread it. If that is the case, temperature checks do absolutely nothing to stop the spread here...
replies(3): >>22760938 #>>22760953 #>>22760972 #
massysett ◴[] No.22760972[source]
I am seeing this logic a lot: “this preventive measure isn’t 100 percent perfect, therefore it’s completely useless.”

Even measures that are only partially effective can make a substantial difference, especially at a population level.

replies(2): >>22761229 #>>22766100 #
ryandrake ◴[] No.22761229[source]
I get the feeling a lot of HN commenters would recommend against condoms because they're only 98% effective, and only if used correctly, therefore completely useless.
replies(1): >>22761463 #
1. AdrianB1 ◴[] No.22761463[source]
No, they would not recommend the day-after pill as one of the core measures. Taking the temperature means you find out something is wrong a week late.