←back to thread

265 points ajaviaad | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.379s | source
Show context
reaperducer ◴[] No.22759971[source]
For those interested in reading the actual journalism, not a blog re-writing someone else's work:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-amazon...

The HN link should probably be changed.

replies(3): >>22760284 #>>22760568 #>>22761443 #
Alex3917 ◴[] No.22760284[source]
For investigative journalism that makes sense. But for press release type content, if anything it's probably more ethical to link to the blogspam version than the original content. Otherwise you're just financially rewarding the "journalists" who only publish positive things about Bezos, the whitehouse, video games, or whatever, and economically punishing the folks we need to hold them accountable.
replies(1): >>22760483 #
1. ◴[] No.22760483[source]