I refuse to use or install their product.
I refuse to use or install their product.
zoom seriously needs to die. no friggin way I'd ever engage in a responsible disclosure with this company - no matter who gets thrown under the bus.
this isn't the first time zoom got caught red-handed[1]. Last year they were called out for installing a local web server in order to disable security controls to get around the deprecated NPAPI[2] ... this is _literally_ what malware does. Seriously fuck zoom!
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22658173
[1] https://medium.com/bugbountywriteup/zoom-zero-day-4-million-...
You're commenting on a post that is about a link that helps people use a web version of Zoom, which by its definition doesn't have the malware issues that people talk about (unless they are breaking sandboxing in the browser which would be pretty major).
What I was replying to was the "no grey area allowed" black and white dying on a hill response to the existence of the tool at all. This is why non technical people roll their eyes at technical folks and ignore us, because so many of us live in this world where we aren't willing to negotiate or hold more than a single thought in our heads at once.
I don't want to use Zoom, I bring up alternatives at my org all the time, and meetings that I control do not use it, and I do not install their binaries on my own devices, instead opting to use the web client when required. But the reality is that I don't get to make that call all the time, and if it's a choice between using Zoom on the web and not communicating at all, then the choice seems pretty clear to me.
if we don't speak up now and give them FIRE, then the covid19 crisis will have been the reason why another surveillance technology gets normalized. working under tracking a la "upwork.com" - where marketeers decide how to screen capture and key-log all input is somehow normal.
note: I'm not attacking your point and didn't think you agree to Zoom's way of doing things. I just feel really strongly about not giving them any benefit of the doubt because they have already got a history of abusing trust.
my comment in the sibling thread mentions why this literally can't be fixed with a browser add-on: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22662212
again: not an attack on your comment, not attacking OP's work either. and we probably agree on more than we disagree here by what I can tell