←back to thread

343 points cvallejo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tempsy ◴[] No.22358654[source]
AMD's stock is wild. It was around $2 just a few years ago and has been on a non-stop trend up to almost $60 today.
replies(2): >>22358979 #>>22360364 #
sdesol ◴[] No.22358979[source]
They really are doing something disruptive. I can't quite remember if this is correct (it has been a while since I last studied business), but in business there is a "blue ocean strategy". The basic premise is, if you can provide a product for half the price, with the twice the value, you will destroy the incumbent.

What AMD is doing is really insane in my opinion. I'm not sure if they are pricing their processors low on purpose and/or if they have found a way to manufacture cheaper and/or Intel was screwing consumers with their pricing since they were so dominate.

No matter what, AMD is able to provide something that is measurably better and significantly cheaper than the incumbent, and if the blue ocean strategy holds, they should become the new incumbent in the near future.

replies(4): >>22359070 #>>22359139 #>>22359222 #>>22359223 #
1. bcrosby95 ◴[] No.22359222[source]
Not only disruptive to their industry, but game changing for those of us writing software. I remember reading all the hoopla over the loss of Dennard scaling 15 years ago (e.g. http://www.gotw.ca/publications/concurrency-ddj.htm). Intel poked along at 2 and 4 core consumer systems for so long.

The argument was always "no one can use more than X cores" - but software seems to trail hardware in these examples, not the reverse. When Zen was first released, many of the less expensive 6 core options performed worse than Intel's similarly priced 4 core chips. But when comparing modern software using those old parts, AMD's 6 core offerings tend to hold up better.

It feels like AMD is finally ushering us into an era where being able to take advantage of large amounts of parallelism is going to become important for almost every developer.