←back to thread

343 points cvallejo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
tpetry ◴[] No.22357449[source]
Now its getting really interesting: In the end you have to compare pricing for a vCore (which is a thread on a cpu) with per-thread performance on AMD vs. Intel. Does anyone know a benchmark like this? Epyc Processors are most often tested on heavy parallelizable tasks and not strictly single thread tasks.
replies(4): >>22357500 #>>22357832 #>>22358054 #>>22358902 #
t3rabytes ◴[] No.22358054[source]
I did some rudimentary testing with AMD vs Intel on AWS recently and found that AMD lacked enough in single threaded perf that it meant they weren’t worth the savings for our workloads (Rails apps).
replies(2): >>22358236 #>>22358831 #
1. actuator ◴[] No.22358236[source]
Care to publish if you have anything stored away from this?

I don't work with Rails anymore but the last Rails app(single threaded, Unicorn) I worked with raw CPU compute was not the bottleneck usually as with most CRUD apps time was mostly spent in I/O. This effect was so pronounced that I had set up most scaling groups on M or R instances as the memory used by the gems was the bottleneck on the number of Rails processes I could spawn in the box without exhausting resources. However I do remember even if CPU was not the bottleneck, moving to a processor with a better single thread performance did improve the median response time at the cost of making the same request throughput costlier.