←back to thread

Mozilla lays off 70

(techcrunch.com)
929 points ameshkov | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.307s | source
Show context
sstangl ◴[] No.22060115[source]
I'm one of the 70. There were no signs that this was imminent, although Mozilla has been struggling financially for many years. I expected that it would happen eventually; I'm relatively well-prepared for it; and it's not too shocking. I did however expect that there would be some warning signs in the lead-up, but that was not the case.

I was working on Cranelift, the WebAssembly compiler that is also a plausible future backend for Rust debug mode. Before that, I worked on the SpiderMonkey JITs for 9 years. If anyone has need for a senior compiler engineer with 10 years of experience writing fast, parallel code, please do let me know.

replies(25): >>22060294 #>>22060308 #>>22060406 #>>22060503 #>>22060539 #>>22060672 #>>22060709 #>>22060717 #>>22060764 #>>22060867 #>>22061498 #>>22061513 #>>22061871 #>>22061921 #>>22061936 #>>22062215 #>>22062264 #>>22062584 #>>22062700 #>>22063128 #>>22063787 #>>22066743 #>>22067359 #>>22067363 #>>22068982 #
_kp6z ◴[] No.22060406[source]
Sounds like a pretty clueless layoff, I guess I expected better from Mozilla than usual corporate derp. If there was truly no dead weight, surely the management could have scaled back their own comp for misdirecting the company? Very few people understand what it means to be a leader in corporate world.
replies(4): >>22060544 #>>22061537 #>>22061633 #>>22062919 #
scarface74 ◴[] No.22060544[source]
How much could they have scaled backed their comp to save 70 jobs?
replies(3): >>22060584 #>>22060667 #>>22060686 #
9152ba83773b ◴[] No.22060686[source]
Mozilla has way too many VP and above employees that are useless (check what the once VP engineering, then interim CTO, then fellow is actually doing for instance). They should let go a few, but as far as I know, none has been fired. Gotta keep getting twice the bonus percentage as regular ICs...
replies(1): >>22062329 #
whatthefoxer ◴[] No.22062329[source]
You mean ekr yea? I don't know what he's doing either or why he's been promoted along the way. Nobody really knows.
replies(1): >>22069813 #
1. 9152ba83773b ◴[] No.22069813[source]
No, not ekr. There's much worse.