←back to thread

Mozilla lays off 70

(techcrunch.com)
929 points ameshkov | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.3s | source
Show context
strict9 ◴[] No.22058568[source]
Not sure of Mozilla’s financial or organizational structure but it seems to be part of a larger trend of de-emphasizing QA departments at software shops large and small over the past 10 or so years.

In many ways test automation tooling has become much easier to use, develop, and manage.

But I suspect the larger driving force is that it’s (arguably) a cost center for an org. The burden of ensuring software quality can be shifted to devs and PMs, though usually with mixed results.

For Mozilla, axing quality and security first is a bad look when those are crucial aspects of a privacy-first company value.

replies(7): >>22058757 #>>22058762 #>>22058953 #>>22059007 #>>22059065 #>>22059192 #>>22060314 #
zelly ◴[] No.22059192[source]
If there's anything they need to axe, it's the Gecko team. Just replace it with V8. The whole layout engine too--replace it with Blink. It is inevitable, so might as well get over with it now and save the wasted human effort and $$$.

I tried to use Firefox recently. It leaked 28 GiB of RAM on x86_64 GNU/Linux with no extensions except uBlock Origin. Happened a few times over the month whenever I visited JS-heavy websites. Never had that happen with Chromium, which runs through megs of JS like butter.

Wouldn't it be nice if an experienced browser dev team maintained a privacy-oriented libre version of Chrome (without manifest v3, sync, and all that trash). Or should they keep doing what they've doing and make the best pro-privacy browser that no one ever uses except indirectly through Tor Browser.

replies(10): >>22059302 #>>22059312 #>>22059422 #>>22059430 #>>22059972 #>>22060992 #>>22060994 #>>22062072 #>>22065318 #>>22074608 #
fencepost ◴[] No.22059422[source]
Could you clarify "recently" a bit more? Clearly it's after the release of uBlock Origin, but I'm pretty sure that there was a big effort to clean up memory use a few years ago.

Maybe it's poor Linux support, I have a distressingly high 4 digit number of tabs open on a Windows box and I don't think I've seen it go past 8gb with multiple weeks of runtime.

Edit: Win10 Pro on a Xeon with 48gb ram available

replies(3): >>22059534 #>>22059638 #>>22059882 #
shpeedy ◴[] No.22059882[source]
Previously, Firefox was fine on computer with 2GB of memory and hundreds of tabs. Now, 8GB is not enough.
replies(1): >>22062089 #
1. sfink ◴[] No.22062089[source]
Have you checked how Chrome does with 8GB now?

Sadly, the sites out there have changed far more than any of the browsers have, and not for the better. They load a ton of crap that does not contribute to the value delivered to the user, but instead contribute value to the site owner and the dozen layers of intermediaries in between user and site owner.