←back to thread

Mozilla lays off 70

(techcrunch.com)
929 points ameshkov | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
dman ◴[] No.22058629[source]
Brendan Eich has a helpful chart of Compensation of Highest paid executive at Mozilla vs Firefox market share over time.

https://twitter.com/BrendanEich/status/1217512049716035584/p...

replies(8): >>22058725 #>>22059044 #>>22059122 #>>22059260 #>>22059384 #>>22059453 #>>22059705 #>>22060015 #
paul7986 ◴[] No.22059384[source]
Seems odd in his tweet he noted he was unable to get funding in the valley for Brave. The guy created JavaScript and was a creator of Firefox. Don't get it ..as JS alone has contributed like how much to world economies, as well to almost every HN reader's wallet/bank.
replies(7): >>22059421 #>>22059434 #>>22059454 #>>22059460 #>>22059493 #>>22061138 #>>22062663 #
Thorentis ◴[] No.22059454[source]
Read more about his background and you'll see why. Cancel culture is definitely real. (There was a post here from WSJ the other day about it - wasn't great since it was more of a whinge, but there are some legitimate examples of "cancel culture" happening, and they are increasing in the tech industry).

tl;dr he was fired for having conservative beliefs, and nobody in the valley would touch him. So he went a founded Brave instead.

replies(2): >>22059513 #>>22059612 #
eschaton ◴[] No.22059513[source]
Don’t sanitize it, he was fired for being anti-gay.

That should make it a little clearer why funders won’t touch him (and many won’t touch his new work).

replies(5): >>22059605 #>>22059622 #>>22059647 #>>22060643 #>>22060809 #
A4ET8a8uTh0 ◴[] No.22059605[source]
I did not know that. It is odd though. I used to remember no one cared what about your Views as long as you were good at what you did. CS was as close to meritocracy as it could have been. It is a shame.
replies(4): >>22059846 #>>22059889 #>>22059961 #>>22060272 #
kick ◴[] No.22059961[source]
CS was never close to meritocracy (I'd argue that finance is/was historically far closer to meritocracy than CS ever was). Eich was raised in the Valley, got a Master's in CS before he had gotten a job, and was a millionaire and investing in Silicon Valley real estate before he had been working for ten years (he never started a company, and only created Javascript after something like eleven). There are people working on life-saving infrastructure in CS who've been working for forty years who don't have a million.

Also, "your Views" are different from "your Actions." If I think you're ridiculous, so what? If I think you're so ridiculous that I pay people money to promote a law that would increase what you have to pay in taxes, suddenly everyone cares, and rightfully so!

replies(3): >>22060476 #>>22060570 #>>22060616 #
BrendanEich ◴[] No.22060616[source]
I was never a millionaire from real estate before I'd been working ten years. Are you perhaps misinformed by someone who was at SGI and exaggerated rumors they heard? I made more off of SGI options than I did by ten years in from real estate, and I never flipped. I've owned the same properties for over 30 years.

I agree with you that many fine people do life-saving or otherwise important work for far less. But facts matter, and I'm here to correct the record.

P.S. I was raised in Pittsburgh and Maryland as much as in the Valley.

replies(2): >>22061455 #>>22061628 #
kick ◴[] No.22061628[source]
This says you were a millionaire before you'd been working ten years, and as far as I'm aware it's fairly accurate? It's a profile of you that happened long before you were controversial. I didn't claim that you were a millionaire because you had invested in real estate, just that you also had invested in real estate (I assumed that it was obvious that the former was probably a precursor to the latter, but I guess not).

https://www.nytimes.com/1996/09/09/business/part-artist-part...

replies(1): >>22061639 #
1. BrendanEich ◴[] No.22061639[source]
It does not say "due to real estate". How hard is this to read accurately and relate on HN faithfully? I had more upside from SGI's IPO than from valley real estate (which was good too, but I never flipped). Yeesh!
replies(1): >>22061686 #
2. kick ◴[] No.22061686[source]
It does not say "due to real estate". How hard is this to read accurately and relate on HN faithfully?

Sir, the last comment was stating that I was trying to avoid implying that it was due to real estate.

> I didn't claim that you were a millionaire because you had invested in real estate

> just that you also had invested in real estate

I'm not accusing you of getting rich off of real estate.

I'm just saying that "investing in real estate" is something that requires a substantial volume of money (as you said, a nest egg): it was a way to show that you were well off, not a way to imply you were a slumlord or something.

replies(1): >>22062308 #
3. BrendanEich ◴[] No.22062308[source]
I misread your comment, sorry. But I must say real estate was cheap in the ‘80s, especially after downturns. Remember the crash of ‘87 aka Black Monday? Yikes, I’m old.