←back to thread

Mozilla lays off 70

(techcrunch.com)
929 points ameshkov | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
ameshkov ◴[] No.22057804[source]
Brendan Eich tweeted that they laid off about 70 people: https://twitter.com/BrendanEich/status/1217517703914643456

This is about 7% of all their employees.

People report that a lot of QA, security, and release management folks were sacked.

A lot more details in the TechCrunch article: https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/15/mozilla-lays-off-70-as-it-...

> In an internal memo, Mozilla chairwoman and interim CEO Mitchell Baker specifically mentions the slow rollout of the organization’s new revenue-generating products as the reason for why it needed to take this decision

edit: fixed the numbers, added some more details.

replies(5): >>22057845 #>>22058286 #>>22058360 #>>22058483 #>>22058983 #
tracker1 ◴[] No.22058483[source]
I'm not sure why they don't largely sack half their marketing budget and concentrate on community outreach from the developer side... that's how they grew in the first place.

I'm also surprised they haven't tried to create commercial mail and communications products. Thunderbird used to be one of the best options out there, and they could easily spin this off into a SaaS and self-host product on the server component. As much as I hated Lotus Notes, something between Lotus Notes, Outlook and MS Teams could be something great and that the Mozilla org would be in a good position to create.

I know they may have good reach with the VPN service as well... I'm unsure how they can reduce security, qa and release management people when orchestration, automation and verification are such huge needs.

They get enough income from search (for now) that they could concentrate on best of breed tech, build mindshare from that, then re-introduce marketing for critical mass.

replies(7): >>22058552 #>>22058694 #>>22058806 #>>22058838 #>>22058853 #>>22059542 #>>22063109 #
Sammi ◴[] No.22058694[source]
The world today is different. Can't skimp on marketing any more, as the competition is extremely heavy on marketing.
replies(4): >>22059012 #>>22059663 #>>22060535 #>>22060618 #
A4ET8a8uTh0 ◴[] No.22059663[source]
Is it though? Tesla is very light on traditional marketing, while its competitors are spending heavily.

Nothing changed. People are the same.

replies(2): >>22059927 #>>22061443 #
fralewsmi ◴[] No.22059927[source]
Tesla also has a product that basically sells itself
replies(1): >>22060058 #
1. A4ET8a8uTh0 ◴[] No.22060058[source]
This is usually what people do say of successful marketing campaigns. Note, that Musk is a walking ad.