←back to thread

390 points AndrewDucker | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.654s | source
Show context
deogeo ◴[] No.21828679[source]
Imprisoned? Not just a fine for the company and settlement requiring them to promise to follow the law gong forward, without admitting wrongdoing? Inconceivable!
replies(2): >>21828768 #>>21829186 #
1. vkou ◴[] No.21828768[source]
Well, the allegations, as presented in the article sound pretty bad, and are a few steps beyond the typical workplace retaliation that you would expect for trying to form a union.

In Silicon Valley, you'll typically get put on a PIP, get your reputation smeared, mysteriously discover that your performance reviews have tanked, or get investigated and fired for violations of a deliberately vague, ill-defined policy that everyone else is breaking all the time.

But you're probably not going to get your family spied on, or blackmailed.

replies(1): >>21828818 #
2. jacquesm ◴[] No.21828818[source]
Any such retaliation should be dealt with harshly. After all it is a fundamental right of workers to collectively bargain and eroding that right is a pretty big crime.
replies(1): >>21829361 #
3. vkou ◴[] No.21829361[source]
It should, but it isn't. At best, it gets hush-hushed with quiet after-the-fact no-admission-of-guilt settlements protected by NDAs.

At worst, you lose your retaliation lawsuit, and have blackballed yourself from the industry. There's a reason employers do background checks on new hires.

The Samsung stuff here, though, is truly beyond the pale, because it extends outside the workplace, and is well-documented. (As opposed to he-said-she-said subjective things like performance reviews...)