←back to thread

256 points reubensutton | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dominotw ◴[] No.21628168[source]
>At least 14,000 trips involved drivers who weren’t who the riders thought they were,

any idea what the source of this info is?

And not sure what the timeframe here is. Is it 14000 since Uber started operating in london?

replies(7): >>21628218 #>>21628235 #>>21628258 #>>21628285 #>>21628364 #>>21628425 #>>21629016 #
fauigerzigerk ◴[] No.21628364[source]
The number comes from Cognizant who were hired to conduct an independent review [1]. They found that 43 drivers out of 45,000 drivers skirted Uber's identity checks committing identity fraud.

[1] https://www.ft.com/content/78827b06-0f6a-11ea-a225-db2f231cf...

replies(3): >>21628420 #>>21628441 #>>21628611 #
dominotw ◴[] No.21628420[source]
ok thank you.

I don't have FT subscription. But 43 out of 45k drivers seems like a pretty good number, certainly not a ban worthy number.

replies(2): >>21628511 #>>21629850 #
1. fauigerzigerk ◴[] No.21629850{3}[source]
There are some other accusations as well and it actually says "at least 43" so that could be open ended. I guess they found 43 and weren't sure if there were others they hadn't found. But I'm just speculating.

You can read the article without a subscription if you google the URL and then click on it from the search results.