←back to thread

256 points reubensutton | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
maxehmookau ◴[] No.21628572[source]
I'm always amazed at how fatalist about this sort of thing Londoners are. Like losing Uber will be a massive problem for a huge portion of the population. London has, by FAR, the best, cheapest and most efficient public transport in the entire UK. Uber is, yeah, cheaper than a black cab but also why is it cheaper? Worse working conditions, VC-subsidised, lower standards for vetting (as we've seen here!) It's not sustainable, and while there's obviously a market need for a cheaper app-based minicab service in London, Uber has proven repeatedly that it can't be trusted to do that.
replies(4): >>21628637 #>>21628709 #>>21629172 #>>21630714 #
hn_throwaway_99 ◴[] No.21628709[source]
> Uber is, yeah, cheaper than a black cab but also why is it cheaper?

Another huge reason is that black cab drivers need to pass The Knowledge, a test of London streets, that often takes 3-4 years of study to pass, and AFAIK the requirements for this test haven't changed in the age of smartphones. This is utterly absurd with modern GPS, and just serves as protectionism and a false barrier to entry for new drivers.

replies(1): >>21628757 #
1. quaquaqua1 ◴[] No.21628757[source]
This comment is based as can be. I don't care if my driver has memorized the streets 100%. I just want a ride down the street for a halfway reasonable price, and the reason I probably want it is because a car is a bit faster and much more lazy/convenient to get there, especially with 3 friends who don't feel like power walking and changing trains twice.