←back to thread

China

(drewdevault.com)
847 points kick | 1 comments | | HN request time: 1.282s | source
Show context
gregwebs ◴[] No.21585487[source]
I don't necessarily disagree with the article, I just want to point out that outside of the US others will readily view this line of thought as hypocritical and self-serving.

As a US citizen, I try to consider how the rest of the world may view our actions (glass houses and all). Following the logic here it would make sense for the rest of the world to cutoff trade with the United States due to the Iraq war, which has caused many civilian deaths.

But if you agree that the rest of the world should have sanctioned the US for the Iraq war (among other things) then there might be a consistency with trying to sanction China.

replies(6): >>21585775 #>>21585888 #>>21586081 #>>21586179 #>>21586945 #>>21587344 #
Aunche ◴[] No.21586081[source]
The US has always valued "principle" over actual results. In Iraq, Saddam was "evil", so he had to go, even though it would leave the entire country in the power vacuum and destroy the livelihoods of the average Iraqi. Ditto for Gaddafi in Libya.

This post is much the same way. A poorer China is only going to deteriorate their human rights. A wealthier China is going to crave for more freedom. This happened in South Korea, which many forget used to be a brutal military dictatorship.

replies(4): >>21586484 #>>21586823 #>>21587243 #>>21587567 #
1. brobinson ◴[] No.21587567[source]
>A poorer China is only going to deteriorate their human rights. A wealthier China is going to crave for more freedom.

This was the lie told to the American people in the 90s to justify PNTR with the PRC. We know it was a bald-faced lie now. Why are you saying this?