←back to thread

298 points elorant | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.99s | source
Show context
bransonf ◴[] No.21573859[source]
What amazes me is that Tik-Tok fills the void created when Twitter killed vine.

Given the popularity of Vine, and the outrage when Twitter killed it, I have no idea why they thought it was a good move.

I’m bullish on Tik-Tok because I think it’s the next logical evolution of social media (and totally captures the Vine fan base which was pretty big to begin with)

First there was text, both Facebook and Twitter. Then images with instagram. Now people want videos that they can consume in short bits of time en mass.

I think you would be amiss to not see TikTok as a potentially big player in social media in the future.

replies(7): >>21574077 #>>21574184 #>>21574740 #>>21575275 #>>21577523 #>>21578787 #>>21579919 #
JohnJamesRambo ◴[] No.21574184[source]
> First there was text, both Facebook and Twitter. Then images with instagram. Now people want videos that they can consume in short bits of time en mass.

What you are describing is the continued fall to smaller and smaller bits of stimulation and information. I’m worried about the consequences of this on the human mind and humanity in general. Our tech is gradually eroding our ability to focus on anything for more than a few seconds. I don’t want a future that is some weird mix of Idiocracy and getting the Black Shakes from Johnny Mnemonic. We need people that aren’t easily manipulated by ads and disinformation campaigns and that can think long and clearly about something.

replies(11): >>21574236 #>>21574239 #>>21574291 #>>21574361 #>>21574499 #>>21575365 #>>21576073 #>>21577219 #>>21577893 #>>21579557 #>>21579716 #
nbardy ◴[] No.21574291[source]
At the same time we have the rise of long form podcasts. Producing quite the opposite effect.
replies(5): >>21574492 #>>21574506 #>>21574540 #>>21574973 #>>21577643 #
m_ke ◴[] No.21574492[source]
90% of podcasts these days are just people rambling on without much thought while trying to sell you something. I have a feeling that most people who listen to podcasts do so for background noise, as a way inject some dopamine into their boring commute or routine chores.

I used to listen to podcasts a ton but switched to listening to lectures or conference talks.

replies(3): >>21577709 #>>21578302 #>>21578803 #
1. hombre_fatal ◴[] No.21578302[source]
At the same time, the criticism is useless without knowing the podcasts someone is listening to.

Pretty big difference between listening to Wendy Williams vs, I don't know, philosophical debates and deep dives into history and all sorts of intellectually stimulating things. Most people I know including myself listen to the latter which is nothing short of welcome mind-expansion and I'm a more interesting person as a result of it.

People listening to podcasts or reading books really aren't the people I'm worried about in the modern era.

replies(1): >>21579593 #
2. m_ke ◴[] No.21579593[source]
I mostly listened to software engineering radio, software engineering daily, talking machines, this week in machine learning, village global, freakonomics, econtalk and other similar tech and business shows.

Most of the content in those shows is still fluff and nowhere near as information dense as a lecture from Stanford or MIT. Take talking machines as an example, an interview with a guy like David Blei will be very shallow and watered down for the general audience, I'd much rather listen to him give a lecture at a machine learning summer school.