Most active commenters
  • dang(7)
  • 9dl(4)
  • mgbmtl(4)
  • (4)
  • GordonS(4)
  • hervature(3)

←back to thread

298 points elorant | 42 comments | | HN request time: 0.701s | source | bottom
Show context
komali2 ◴[] No.21574384[source]
Aight, conspiracy theory time.

I'm becoming concerned about PRC influence in my country (USA). From my perspective the PRC (government) is blatantly evil, and happily engaging in cultural warfare, and nobody seems to be fighting back.

I see absurd astroturfing and shilling on social media here (Reddit, Twitter, Facebook). It's always obvious - whereas a genuine criticizer of the Hong Kong protestors might ask about violence, the shills will always use the word "ISIS" somewhere in their message.

It's everywhere and we don't seem to be fighting back. I browse Chinese social media and while my Mandarin isn't great I'm not seeing any level of AstroTurfing at all. So am I just a crazy conspiracy person? Is the PRC astroturfing not a big deal? Maybe my concerns are valid but that doesn't justify further concern about the influx of PRC messaging vectors to the USA, i.e. tiktok?

When I worked in the PRC I got to see first hand the strong-arm of the Party. Every business involved in communication had a government official whose entire job was to ensure the company "protected the social wellbeing of the people of the PRC" or similar. I can only assume tiktok has the same and I can only assume it's a matter of time before the Party starts directing the company to leverage their access to a massive US audience in a way that benefits the "social wellbeing," i.e. by disseminating PRC propaganda.

replies(20): >>21574430 #>>21574539 #>>21574613 #>>21574635 #>>21574656 #>>21574774 #>>21574822 #>>21574838 #>>21575081 #>>21575457 #>>21575566 #>>21575579 #>>21576032 #>>21576254 #>>21576412 #>>21576442 #>>21576575 #>>21576672 #>>21576865 #>>21577032 #
1. pcroh ◴[] No.21574430[source]
Exactly the way I feel about American influence in Europe. It's not too bad, you'll get used to it.
replies(5): >>21574574 #>>21574592 #>>21574634 #>>21574719 #>>21577128 #
2. whatshisface ◴[] No.21574574[source]
What are the issues that America is trying to push in Europe?
replies(3): >>21574674 #>>21574821 #>>21575062 #
3. 9dl ◴[] No.21574592[source]
I don't think someone should even consider to get used to commie influence

Or in 5-10 years that someone will be in situation worse than HK now

4. oarabbus_ ◴[] No.21574634[source]
You mean to, in supposed good faith, suggest that USA influence in Europe is similar and/or equivalent to Chinese influence and interference in the USA?
replies(1): >>21574639 #
5. pcroh ◴[] No.21574639[source]
Yes. Are you familiar with the NATO?
replies(2): >>21574681 #>>21574683 #
6. mgbmtl ◴[] No.21574674[source]
As a Canadian, random examples: Indifference to violence, hypocrisy on nudity, monetizing privacy (no respect for privacy), monetizing medical care.

(I don't mean to start a flame war, but they are topics where EU and Canada tend to disagree with major US trends)

replies(6): >>21574748 #>>21574760 #>>21575505 #>>21576048 #>>21576594 #>>21576956 #
7. oarabbus_ ◴[] No.21574681{3}[source]
Quite. I think I'll stop responding to this thread because we're not going to see eye-to-eye here. Despite the current US President's love for despots and totalitarianism, that doesn't describe the USA.
8. 9dl ◴[] No.21574683{3}[source]
Did you mean that old organisation which defend world from soviet invasion?
replies(3): >>21574715 #>>21574732 #>>21575136 #
9. ◴[] No.21574719[source]
10. ◴[] No.21574748{3}[source]
11. whatshisface ◴[] No.21574760{3}[source]
Major US trends, but are people shilling on Reddit to support them? That's an honest question, I don't really read Reddit. I know there are a lot of people in the US who honestly believe in, say, private healthcare, so a lot of the comments in support of it could be explained as coming from Americans expressing their opinions, as opposed to government or corporate agents pushing an agenda.
replies(1): >>21574955 #
12. ◴[] No.21574800{8}[source]
13. the-dude ◴[] No.21574821[source]
The occasional war comes to mind.
14. mgbmtl ◴[] No.21574955{4}[source]
I guess there can be a lot of influence in a discussion based on how comments are upvoted, how algorithms will favour one type of content over another? (especially when advertising is guiding it all, and lobbies are big advertisers)

I enjoyed this article: https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a9335/upvote...

I also rarely visit Reddit, but for Facebook and Twitter, I guess there has been plenty of research on how people can manipulate public opinion by sharing/voting, and also the impact of their respective algorithms for promoting content?

Of course, Tik Tok is no different, and we should be worried. They do the same thing, only it's not 'our' lobbies and we have little control on them.

15. ◴[] No.21575062[source]
16. GordonS ◴[] No.21575136{4}[source]
I hope this is sarcasm?

The things the USA did supposedly in the name of stopping "red danger" were utterly dispicable, and still have an impact today.

replies(5): >>21575194 #>>21575301 #>>21575508 #>>21575792 #>>21577159 #
17. 9dl ◴[] No.21575301{5}[source]
Wait

So you think that "red danger" was fake?

Or "red danger" did (and do) less despicable things?

replies(2): >>21576036 #>>21577173 #
18. hervature ◴[] No.21575505{3}[source]
As a fellow Canadian can you expand on this?

Canada has been involved in every war that the US has been in my lifetime (born in 1993). Don't know what you mean on hypocrisy on nudity, but I only became comfortable with it when I visited Scandinavia when I was 22; seems like Canada has a similar issue.

I'll maybe give you medical care, but this is an incredibly complex topic. To think that public health care isn't monetized is a naïve point of view.

Somehow, the only thing that the Canadian government has done differently than the US is that it has convinced its people that it is not the US. That's my honest opinion.

replies(3): >>21575991 #>>21576091 #>>21576566 #
19. merpnderp ◴[] No.21575508{5}[source]
"red danger"? Like when Cuban intervened in Angola and murdered 10's of thousands or dozens of others horrors around the globe?

Hell, just think of how many excessive deaths have been caused around the globe by the USSR's push of socialism, retarding growth by decades everywhere it won.

You'd have to be a hard core ideologue to not look at the 20th century and think the "red danger" wasn't the most evil thing to ever happen to humanity.

replies(4): >>21575748 #>>21576282 #>>21576518 #>>21577197 #
20. 9dl ◴[] No.21575748{6}[source]
soviets never pushed socialism

Never

That word was a mask for totalitarian ideology

21. rumanator ◴[] No.21575792{5}[source]
You are simply wrong on so many levels. NATO is the reason why the iron curtain stayed where it was and why the Russian federation hasn't steam-rolled Western Europe.

If you believe the US is the only actor that benefitted from this development, you're somehow ignoring about 800 million people and over two dozen countries who remained free and independent thanks to NATO.

replies(2): >>21576866 #>>21577166 #
22. ishjoh ◴[] No.21575991{4}[source]
> Canada has been involved in every war that the US has been in my lifetime

Since the US is Canada's largest trading partner, this will always be the case, but there are huge and important differences in the level of involvement. Famously the level of involvement in the Iraq war was almost non-existent. Canada's involvement consisted of patrolling surrounding waters, and approximately 100 Canadian soldiers who were embedded in American forces as a sort of culteral military exchange[1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_and_the_Iraq_War

replies(1): >>21577207 #
23. GordonS ◴[] No.21576036{6}[source]
> So you think that "red danger" was fake

I didn't say that - I think the US reaction to the threat was horrendous.

> Or "red danger" did (and do) less despicable things?

That's whataboutism - you would hope that a country that bills itself as "land of the free" would aim for a little better than that.

replies(1): >>21577010 #
24. katbyte ◴[] No.21576048{3}[source]
While i agree with you on the first two as US movies and culture to propagate those values, third you could argue that europe and canada are pushing more privacy onto america due to GDPR and PIPEDA and companies having to follow them, but the last one i entirely have to disagree with you on the last one.

I don't see the US trying to export or push that idea/policy and i can't see it ever gaining traction in canada or the EU.

25. GordonS ◴[] No.21576086{6}[source]
The 2 scenarios are not mutually exclusive - the threat from communism could have been averted without overthrowing democracies, arming terrorists etc.

Something like 200k people died in the civil war that ensued in Guatamala after the US-backed coup. And that is but one example. It could be argued that a lot of the violence and instability in Latin America is as a result of US intervetion.

26. mgbmtl ◴[] No.21576091{4}[source]
Violence: We have very different gun control laws, and general perception towards guns and violence. In my kid's primary school, they weren't even allowed to pretend-shoot at each other. Whereas I have to remind my US friends to leave their gun at home if driving to Canada (and yes, one of them had their gun confiscated at the border).

Medical care monetisation: sure there is a big private industry, but it's scales different than in the US. And it did not say that it does not exist, only that we tend to disagree on the trend (ex: pharma insurance, now deployed in some provinces, and likely to become federal).

Nudity: granted, I'm from Quebec, it might be different, but things like nipples, breastfeeding, nudity in art, being naked in locker rooms, seeing friends naked (non-sexually), etc. people tend to be much more indifferent about nudity and more comfortable with their body. Obviously, that's a huge generalization and perhaps anecdotal, but I heard this often.

Ah, and I guess with regards to violence, is our difference in free speech: hate speech is not permitted (with exclusions for religious groups, because of LGBT issues, iirc).

Again, these are what I think are non-aligned trends, and topics that have an impact on moderation/algorithms online, not a hard truth. Obviously not everyone agrees on these topics, some regions are more divided than others, and these views tend to evolve in time.

27. GordonS ◴[] No.21576282{6}[source]
> Hell, just think of how many excessive deaths have been caused around the globe by the USSR's push of socialism, retarding growth by decades everywhere it won.

Hell, just think of the violence, misery and excessive deaths that have occurred across Latin America and the Middle East because of the USA's interventions.

My point is that just because the USSR did worse, doesn't excuse the USA's actions, which still have an impact to this day.

28. McWobbleston ◴[] No.21576518{6}[source]
Are you conveniently forgetting the forceful seizure of an entire continent, displacement of native populations, importing millions of human beings to be used as slaves, colonization and plunder of natural resources across the globe, and deliberate destabilization of regions for profit?

You need to check out the rose glasses you're wearing yourself

replies(1): >>21577193 #
29. rchaud ◴[] No.21576566{4}[source]
> Canada has been involved in every war that the US has been in my lifetime (born in 1993).

Canada was not party to the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

> Somehow, the only thing that the Canadian government has done differently than the US is that it has convinced its people that it is not the US.

Canada did not suffer a financial crisis to the extent that the US did in 2008 because banks here are regulated very differently than in the US. Also, the likelihood of medical bills causing financial ruin is much lower here.

replies(1): >>21577195 #
30. theredbox ◴[] No.21576594{3}[source]
As an eastern european i feel the same just from the opposite perspective. Western European push for values that fundamentally cannot work in my country.
31. izacus ◴[] No.21576866{6}[source]
> You are simply wrong on so many levels. NATO is the reason why the iron curtain stayed where it was and why the Russian federation hasn't steam-rolled Western Europe.

There are no historical artifacts claiming that USSR ever had a serious plan to "steamroll" Western Europe. If anything, they were deathly terrified of NATO incursion into Russia and almost pathologically attached to creating a buffer zone of Warszaw Pact states.

Please do not mix up US cold war propaganda with historic facts, those are not quite the same.

32. dang ◴[] No.21576956{3}[source]
Please don't take HN threads further into nationalistic flamewar. This is insanely off topic and can't end well.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>21577851 #
33. larnmar ◴[] No.21577010{7}[source]
This whole thread is based on whataboutism! It’s supposed to be about Chinese influence, and then someone derailed it into talking about American influence, and now the whole thread is 90% comments about America and 10% comments about China.

Note: this also happens in pretty much every other thread about a country that isn’t America. God forbid anyone ever discuss anything else, Americans want to relitigate the same old tired “why my country sucks” debates!

And for what? Is any useful information being conveyed? No, it’s mostly just some kind of social status signalling — Americans of certain insecure social class feel the need to complain about America at every opportunity to distinguish themselves from people of a lower social class because patriotism is coded as a low-class activity.

Yes you’re all very sophisticated and I’m sure you like high speed trains and such. Can we please stop talking about the same thing all the time?

Love,

A non American

34. dang ◴[] No.21577128[source]
Please don't take HN threads further into nationalistic flamewar. The results below are hand-wringingly wretched.

I know you're sincere but sincerely burning this place down is still destructive.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

35. dang ◴[] No.21577159{5}[source]
Please don't take HN threads further into nationalistic flamewar. This is the last thing we need here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

36. dang ◴[] No.21577166{6}[source]
Please fight the cold war somewhere else. We don't want flamewars here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

37. dang ◴[] No.21577173{6}[source]
Nationalistic and ideological flamewar are not welcome here. No more of this, please, on HN.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

38. dang ◴[] No.21577193{7}[source]
Please don't take HN threads further into nationalistic or ideological flamewar. Also, please be careful not to cross into personal attack, which is a force multiplier on all things bad here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

39. hervature ◴[] No.21577195{5}[source]
> Canada was not party to the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

That's what is reported. I highly suspect JTF2 was involved since the beginning. This directly proving my point of the government misleading the people.

[0] - https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/10/02/war-crimes-in-the-da...

40. dang ◴[] No.21577197{6}[source]
Please don't take HN threads further into nationalistic or ideological flamewar.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

41. hervature ◴[] No.21577207{5}[source]
Link from my sibling comment:

https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/10/02/war-crimes-in-the-da...

42. mgbmtl ◴[] No.21577851{4}[source]
sorry :)