←back to thread

2525 points hownottowrite | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bayesian_horse ◴[] No.21191285[source]
It's really hard to tell the difference between what is genuinely offensive and what is not.

No easy answers. In this case, maybe there is a relatively simple rule: Supporting democracy must not in itself be regarded as offensive...

replies(8): >>21191379 #>>21191486 #>>21191575 #>>21191815 #>>21191939 #>>21192121 #>>21193685 #>>21194741 #
trentnix ◴[] No.21191379[source]
It is hard to tell, that is true. And that reality is exploited to silence opposition and control others.

That’s why language policing, hate speech laws, Twitter mobs, and bully-the-bully efforts are abominations. So really, the answer is easy: everyone has the right to offend, and has no right not to be offended. Your simple rule doesn’t go far enough.

replies(2): >>21191553 #>>21192443 #
streb-lo ◴[] No.21192443[source]
Hate-speech laws exist because people are programmable.

Try and tell me your opinions are your own and the books and media you consume do not own some portion of them.

Hate-speech laws exist to prevent the programming of people to systematically hate and exterminate other people, a lesson that has been learned many times over in history.

replies(4): >>21192714 #>>21193795 #>>21194227 #>>21197548 #
1. 1000units ◴[] No.21197548{3}[source]
Hate-speech laws are ridiculous. They only have their cheerleaders because some people hate Nazis more than they love what Nazis threatened to destroy. Never made sense to me.