←back to thread

2525 points hownottowrite | 4 comments | | HN request time: 1.2s | source
Show context
FillardMillmore ◴[] No.21191608[source]
So we are at the point where American video game developers are banning people from e-sports competitions for their comments over a domestic issue in a foreign country? Because the Chinese government probably didn't like his comments, that counts as 'public disrepute'? This is just wild to me.
replies(2): >>21191753 #>>21193372 #
taytus ◴[] No.21191753[source]
It is wild, but it's also part of their own rules: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGVTuRlXkAA0ovF?format=png

Honest question: Can we call this unfair if it was already laid out as part of their rules?

replies(4): >>21191970 #>>21192008 #>>21192020 #>>21192039 #
groby_b ◴[] No.21192020[source]
Yes. You presuppose that all rules - via their nature of being rules - are automatically fair. They aren't. Especially not if they're not arrived at by consensus, but unilaterally laid out.
replies(3): >>21193382 #>>21194119 #>>21196033 #
1. taytus ◴[] No.21196033[source]
I never said I thought the rules were fair, I meant the banning.

Their product, their rules, you break the rules, then you accept the consequences.

replies(1): >>21197655 #
2. ClumsyPilot ◴[] No.21197655[source]
Except they are not. They are nebulous catch-all clauses applied on a whim.
replies(1): >>21198270 #
3. taytus ◴[] No.21198270[source]
Then do not accept them. Who is forcing people to become pro gamers or playing games of a company they don't agree with the TOS?
replies(1): >>21201826 #
4. ClumsyPilot ◴[] No.21201826{3}[source]
Ah, that old chestnut, yes.

The day you can hold a corporation accountable for breaking their own terms of service is the day I will come around to this argument.

As things stand, they can have an obligation to keep your data secure, have system with massive security holes, loose your data resulting in you being a victim of fraud, and the company will not pay a penny.