←back to thread

2525 points hownottowrite | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
FillardMillmore ◴[] No.21191608[source]
So we are at the point where American video game developers are banning people from e-sports competitions for their comments over a domestic issue in a foreign country? Because the Chinese government probably didn't like his comments, that counts as 'public disrepute'? This is just wild to me.
replies(2): >>21191753 #>>21193372 #
taytus ◴[] No.21191753[source]
It is wild, but it's also part of their own rules: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGVTuRlXkAA0ovF?format=png

Honest question: Can we call this unfair if it was already laid out as part of their rules?

replies(4): >>21191970 #>>21192008 #>>21192020 #>>21192039 #
groby_b ◴[] No.21192020[source]
Yes. You presuppose that all rules - via their nature of being rules - are automatically fair. They aren't. Especially not if they're not arrived at by consensus, but unilaterally laid out.
replies(3): >>21193382 #>>21194119 #>>21196033 #
bdowling ◴[] No.21194119[source]
Creating rules by consensus is actually a terrible way to ensure that those with views counter to the majority are treated fairly.
replies(1): >>21195407 #
1. groby_b ◴[] No.21195407[source]
It works better than fiat rules. That's kind of why we have democracies. (Well, not in China. So maybe that's the point)