←back to thread

2525 points hownottowrite | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.008s | source
Show context
zwaps ◴[] No.21190952[source]
Then we have to boycott Hearthstone. While the current case is neither surprising nor substantially important, it is important because of principle.

Blizzard is not responsible for what players say in interviews. In our society, it still matters that people can tolerate other opinions.

The Chinese government tries to make it a new normal that entire people can have their "feelings hurt" (what?) by mere non-insulting opinions, and it tries to make it a new normal that all actors should censor any undesirable or potentially undesirable opinion.

If that is indeed the way, then our society and the discourse therein is no longer free, and the CCP has won.

We need to keep these firms in our mind. We need to keep a list of when this happens, and we need to sanction this as best as we can. Similarly, anyone standing up to censorship should have our support.

I can be pro HK, or I can be pro China, and I can voice opinions because doing so either way is an equally valid form of free expression. But it can not be that one side gets pre-emptively censored to appease the CCP, or any actor with the power to DEFINE the bar of what is reasonable expression of opinions.

replies(35): >>21191046 #>>21191149 #>>21191296 #>>21191337 #>>21191361 #>>21191457 #>>21191561 #>>21191609 #>>21191630 #>>21191686 #>>21191709 #>>21191715 #>>21191742 #>>21191842 #>>21191964 #>>21191971 #>>21191980 #>>21192069 #>>21192094 #>>21192118 #>>21192246 #>>21192449 #>>21192535 #>>21192785 #>>21192985 #>>21193152 #>>21193306 #>>21193442 #>>21193508 #>>21193629 #>>21193748 #>>21194032 #>>21194140 #>>21194276 #>>21194794 #
iamsb ◴[] No.21194140[source]
Would you oppose firing of James Damore as well?

Look I understand that we need to have free expression and free speech. Absolutely. But a business wants to protect itself from negative political reputation. If the gamer was talking about say LGBT rights, and his opinions were considered against the current acceptable position on the matter, and then he was banned, I am sure everyone would have applauded blizzard.

Let us not put burden of being politically correct on free market corporations.

replies(4): >>21194255 #>>21194277 #>>21194361 #>>21194390 #
1. dontreact ◴[] No.21194277[source]
Supporting HK protests is very different from falsely claiming that the hiring bar was lowered for women (it said this in the doc, I know enough people at Google who participate in hiring committee to know that it was a false statement).
replies(2): >>21194362 #>>21194603 #
2. ◴[] No.21194362[source]
3. iamsb ◴[] No.21194603[source]
Fair enough. I could have used a different example. Though might be worth a thought experiment might be worth considering if people would in fact confirm they treated women differently in hiring process.