←back to thread

2525 points hownottowrite | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.679s | source
Show context
zygimantasdev ◴[] No.21190462[source]
South Park is spot on this season. You could say they are good with predictions, but I think they just gave different perspective to something that already has been happening (episodes on China censorship)
replies(2): >>21190516 #>>21191113 #
bdibs ◴[] No.21190516[source]
While I agree they’re spot on, it’s not like this is a new issue.
replies(3): >>21190564 #>>21190595 #>>21191169 #
kkarakk ◴[] No.21190595[source]
China has been leveraging their power "quietly" for some time now. Anything anti-China gets buried or discredited or shouted down using whataboutisms. Even here on hackernews you'll see tons of posts on negative chinese news from month old accounts fuzzing the narrative saying some variation of "it's not easy to understand if you're not chinese etc etc"

The hong kong issue is just bringing the issue into the mainstream

replies(2): >>21190794 #>>21190885 #
jplayer01 ◴[] No.21190885[source]
Not sure why you're being downvoted. I've wasted too much time on HN arguing with people who simply don't believe China isn't as bad as portrayed, and believe everything that comes up here or on other sites is nothing but anti-Chinese propaganda.

There are plenty of people who are so jaded that they're unwilling to condemn China for all the immoral things they do, much less economic or political behaviours that aren't overtly immoral, but do have clear negative impact on the Western sphere of influence and economic status.

As bad as the US is, I don't want a country run by such an authoritarian, ruthless government like the CCP to take over the position as the world's superpower.

replies(1): >>21191106 #
boomboomsubban ◴[] No.21191106[source]
>but do have clear negative impact on the Western sphere of influence and economic status.

And this is such a problem that you think the US should take actions to try and overthrow their government? Even considering how terribly most US regime changes damage a country, and the horrible civil wars that have accompanied the previous Chinese collapses?

>As bad as the US is, I don't want a country run by such an authoritarian, ruthless government like the CCP to take over the position as the world's superpower

I'm not thrilled at the prospect of a Chinese super power either. However, I also view the US as a rather terrible superpower, and unlike in China I have some amount of agency to change that.

replies(2): >>21191352 #>>21192153 #
yters ◴[] No.21191352[source]
You don't think there is any moral difference between the two?
replies(2): >>21191520 #>>21192480 #
boomboomsubban ◴[] No.21191520[source]
No matter what difference you see between them now, trying to topple their government would make the US far more immoral.
replies(1): >>21191568 #
yters ◴[] No.21191568[source]
Sure it depends on what manner, but what is wrong with a regime change? I am sure there are plenty of Falun Gong, Muslims and Christians who would not mind a freer government. I think only US business would mind because they would not have such easy access to cheap labor and electrical and human parts.
replies(1): >>21192739 #
boomboomsubban ◴[] No.21192739[source]
>Sure it depends on what manner, but what is wrong with a regime change?

The incredibly bloody events that are likely to happen enacting a regime change that wouldn't ensure a freer government.

replies(1): >>21193305 #
yters ◴[] No.21193305[source]
Yes I agree. Revolution is not the way. That's how China for into the current mess. But I see no problem with assisting with regime change from within.
replies(1): >>21193602 #
boomboomsubban ◴[] No.21193602[source]
So you want to replace Xi with some other member of the Politburo? Pulling that off seems unlikely to help much, and failure would strengthen his position.

I don't know any other internal regime change that isn't a revolution.

replies(1): >>21194245 #
1. yters ◴[] No.21194245[source]
I think the biggest is from the rest of the world. We are complicit because we happily buy goods from such a horrible regime. We need an international boycott on China until they shape up.

Ideological. Communism and human rights violation are seen as acceptable due to a specific worldview. Demonstrating the error with the worldview can change people's minds and lead to internal regime change.

replies(1): >>21194558 #
2. boomboomsubban ◴[] No.21194558[source]
>. We need an international boycott on China until they shape up.

Right, so you want to economically cripple China over human rights abuses. Not only is this likely to end in war, millions would likely die from supply shortages.

>Demonstrating the error with the worldview can change people's minds and lead to internal regime change

The capitalist societies banding together to starve China out is unlikely to convert them to your side. It didn't the last time we tried.

replies(2): >>21195911 #>>21196151 #
3. yters ◴[] No.21195911[source]
Probably there's a bit of a continuum here between starving China and not batting an eye as they scoop the living eyes out of some poor Falun Gong after they slice him open and cut out all his organs.
4. cthalupa ◴[] No.21196151[source]
Ah, yes. We should continue the status quo, where China continues to perpetuate human rights abuses, as well as utilizing their economic power to influence and control international companies.

We're enabling and funding this. We should stop.