←back to thread

2525 points hownottowrite | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
KaoruAoiShiho ◴[] No.21191959[source]
Absolutely agree, it's time for American video games to stop publishing in China. It's not worth the Chinese influence on our society.
replies(7): >>21192116 #>>21192581 #>>21192615 #>>21193024 #>>21193126 #>>21193187 #>>21194829 #
ndury ◴[] No.21192581[source]
These studio's should not stop publishing their games in China. The issue lies that these studio's happily comply with whatever restrictions a govt is willing to oblige due to possibly playerbase loss. Think lootboxes, forbidden skins in regions, exc... exc..

Companies as big as Blizzard should be prepared to lose 5/10/15% of their playerbase to defend free speech, the thing is they do not care about free speech. All these companies care about is revenue.

replies(4): >>21192794 #>>21193034 #>>21193059 #>>21193079 #
Aarostotle ◴[] No.21193059[source]
This one is tricky. I always thought they have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders, so they have to tread that line as well.

Does anyone know how that fits into the picture?

replies(3): >>21193298 #>>21193312 #>>21193495 #
1. mikestew ◴[] No.21193312[source]
Does anyone know how that fits into the picture?

Well, at least you left out the "legally required" part. The board most certainly has a responsibility to shareholders. It can be a long and tiring argument, but from my POV there is only "responsibility" not "fiduciary responsibility". Now, most of the time the shareholders want more money. But AFAICT, there is not a law on the books that says that the board must maximize profits above all else. For instance, and perhaps it's a poor example, but Costco says they will make 15% profit. That's it. You want more money, sell more stuff. Doesn't the board have a "fiduciary responsibility" to bump that to 16% if they can get away with it? Apparently not.