←back to thread

2525 points hownottowrite | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.451s | source
Show context
KaoruAoiShiho ◴[] No.21191959[source]
Absolutely agree, it's time for American video games to stop publishing in China. It's not worth the Chinese influence on our society.
replies(7): >>21192116 #>>21192581 #>>21192615 #>>21193024 #>>21193126 #>>21193187 #>>21194829 #
ndury ◴[] No.21192581[source]
These studio's should not stop publishing their games in China. The issue lies that these studio's happily comply with whatever restrictions a govt is willing to oblige due to possibly playerbase loss. Think lootboxes, forbidden skins in regions, exc... exc..

Companies as big as Blizzard should be prepared to lose 5/10/15% of their playerbase to defend free speech, the thing is they do not care about free speech. All these companies care about is revenue.

replies(4): >>21192794 #>>21193034 #>>21193059 #>>21193079 #
1. jinnbama ◴[] No.21193034[source]
Blind defense of this narrow and immature notion of free speech from Blizzard would have people up on stage shouting racial slurs.

Rather, I think a consistent and humane stance on ethics and human rights abuses would help and address the real issue here.

They have the right to deny people access to their services and nothing they do is essential, but they do and will very obviously grab a lot of negative attention when they cut someone off for supporting the liberation of a group that's being brutalized by a major world power's corrupt police force.

replies(1): >>21194777 #
2. ndury ◴[] No.21194777[source]
> Blind defense of this narrow and immature notion of free speech from Blizzard would have people up on stage shouting racial slurs.

What narrow and immature notion of free speech? What the player said or what I have said?

Of course a consistent and humane stance on ethics and human right abuses would address the real issue. I do not believe for one second that its own employee's believe in the stance Blizzard has taken. Will some not care? Of course, it is their right to not care.

Is it feasible to think Blizzard has done risk analysis on the outcome of these events depending on which stance they've taken? What would they lose by taking a negative stance on the matter (which they have done)? They've currently created a situation where players of their games, whom aren't even located anywhere close to China have decided to step down from any blizzard game. What would they gain by taking a positive stance on the matter? Say the Chinese were to cut them off entirely, revenue loss of 25-30, perhaps 35%?

I understand the decision from a management perspective, I truely do. I do not understand the decision from a neutral, humane perspective. Blizzard entertainment does not have roots in China Blizzard entertainment's main focus is entertainment, fictional entertainment. Can u imagine a game, based on a pseudo-reality where free speech is non-existent? I for one can't..

I'm not sure where I'm going with my reply, I just wanted to write out these few sentences.