←back to thread

2525 points hownottowrite | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
bayesian_horse ◴[] No.21191285[source]
It's really hard to tell the difference between what is genuinely offensive and what is not.

No easy answers. In this case, maybe there is a relatively simple rule: Supporting democracy must not in itself be regarded as offensive...

replies(8): >>21191379 #>>21191486 #>>21191575 #>>21191815 #>>21191939 #>>21192121 #>>21193685 #>>21194741 #
ekianjo ◴[] No.21191815[source]
> It's really hard to tell the difference between what is genuinely offensive and what is not.

You can't have both "Free Speech" and "You Can't Say Anything Offensive" at the same time, because there is too much overlap. So you have to choose. The US constitution is pretty clear that "Free Speech" is the higher principle.

replies(2): >>21191847 #>>21191901 #
umvi ◴[] No.21191847[source]
"Free Speech only protects you from the government, not private companies who don't want to tolerate your hate on their platform"

I don't agree with this stance, but it is an oft-heard one defending companies who stifle speech (as long as the stifled speech was a far right Nazi website or anti-LGBT comments).

As we see, that stance is dangerous and extends to companies stifling politically inconvenient speech like "I support Hong Kong protesters".

replies(4): >>21192377 #>>21192944 #>>21193291 #>>21201347 #
1. XorNot ◴[] No.21192944[source]
We're free to protest the move, but I'd hardly say that Apple should be forced by anyone to actually change their stance. It's their choice where they want to stand on public opinion - much as it's our choice to boycott Apple products or protest that decision they've made.