←back to thread

2525 points hownottowrite | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
zygimantasdev ◴[] No.21190462[source]
South Park is spot on this season. You could say they are good with predictions, but I think they just gave different perspective to something that already has been happening (episodes on China censorship)
replies(2): >>21190516 #>>21191113 #
bdibs ◴[] No.21190516[source]
While I agree they’re spot on, it’s not like this is a new issue.
replies(3): >>21190564 #>>21190595 #>>21191169 #
kkarakk ◴[] No.21190595[source]
China has been leveraging their power "quietly" for some time now. Anything anti-China gets buried or discredited or shouted down using whataboutisms. Even here on hackernews you'll see tons of posts on negative chinese news from month old accounts fuzzing the narrative saying some variation of "it's not easy to understand if you're not chinese etc etc"

The hong kong issue is just bringing the issue into the mainstream

replies(2): >>21190794 #>>21190885 #
TeMPOraL ◴[] No.21190794[source]
> Anything anti-China gets buried or discredited or shouted down using whataboutisms.

Interesting. The only time I see whataboutism and China/Russia brought up in the same HN thread is when somebody tries to defend China/Russia by pointing out similar problems in the West, and that person gets shouted down and accused of engaging in "whataboutism".

replies(3): >>21190828 #>>21190968 #>>21192260 #
Eldt ◴[] No.21190828[source]
Sounds like you're describing the same thing. I've seen many comments defend China and try to turn attention towards actions done by the US.
replies(2): >>21190860 #>>21191376 #
1. TeMPOraL ◴[] No.21190860[source]
I initially read kkarakk's comment as a reverse of what I wrote, but even if we're talking the same, I personally believe that any and all accusations of whataboutism are just thought-terminating cliches and are invalid from the start.