←back to thread

Apple Hides Taiwan Flag in Hong Kong

(blog.emojipedia.org)
1456 points pulisse | 7 comments | 07 Oct 19 16:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.477s | source | bottom
Show context
tibbon ◴[07 Oct 19 18:36 UTC] No.21184395[source]▶
What's it take for an engineer in the US to actually do something like this?

If my boss/product manager wanted me to do something like this, I'd be calling them out for shitty politics, and telling them they need to find a new engineer because I'd quit immediately - and likely incite others to come with me.

Maybe I have a higher sense of morality than others, but I'm no shill for China's power over Taiwan. I can use my entitlement/privilege as an engineer to say "fuck off" to anyone who wants me to do things I find immoral. Furthering the needs of a power hungry regime looking to assert dominance over others? Nope. I spend all my day working to further democracy and freedom, not to enable free thought and self-determination to be squashed.

Whoever coded this change and approved this PR, shame on you.

replies(33): >>21184428 #>>21184431 #>>21184492 #>>21184500 #>>21184510 #>>21184524 #>>21184534 #>>21184575 #>>21184603 #>>21184639 #>>21184651 #>>21184655 #>>21184657 #>>21184760 #>>21184784 #>>21184802 #>>21184840 #>>21184903 #>>21184916 #>>21185103 #>>21185143 #>>21185144 #>>21185165 #>>21185252 #>>21185274 #>>21185287 #>>21185423 #>>21185551 #>>21185554 #>>21185560 #>>21185770 #>>21185850 #>>21185902 #
mh8h ◴[07 Oct 19 19:00 UTC] No.21184657[source]▶
I just want to add another angle. Apple, as well as other tech companies, have many employees in China, and a lot of non-Chinese employees that travel to China regularly. Many of these changes are demanded by the PRC government and not abiding by those might risk imprisonment for those employees.

Disclaimer: I work for Apple, but I don't work on iOS.

replies(1): >>21184720 #
tibbon ◴[07 Oct 19 19:06 UTC] No.21184720[source]▶
Sure; but literally any day Tim Cook can say, "Ok China, I no longer play your game. Enjoy having no support or economic progress from us - bye".

My point wasn't a specific developer (as you point out, they might have been in China themselves and unable to do otherwise), but that anyone in the chain who is "safe" and in a position of power and privilege to not-play China's game, I find morally dubious. Engineers in the US are people I count as having this safety and privilege, but not engineers in China.

Executives, PMs and management in the US I also count as being able to tell China to shove it with their demands.

replies(5): >>21184793 #>>21184800 #>>21184828 #>>21184880 #>>21185098 #
1. BinaryIdiot ◴[07 Oct 19 19:39 UTC] No.21185098[source]▶
> Sure; but literally any day Tim Cook can say, "Ok China, I no longer play your game. Enjoy having no support or economic progress from us - bye".

No he cannot. He would be immediately removed at CEO and replaced with someone who played ball.

Remember, Apple is a publicly traded company. What you're suggesting is, at a whim, Tim Cook could just completely tank the company. China has far, far more leverage over Apple than Apple has over them plus it's a huge market they're making progress in.

replies(1): >>21185153 #
2. reaperducer ◴[07 Oct 19 19:44 UTC] No.21185153[source]▶
No he cannot

Sure he can. Google bailed on China once. Apple certainly has the money and talent to do the same.

He would be immediately removed at CEO and replaced with someone who played ball.

Would he? Why do you assume that this would be bad for it share price, or that the majority of shareholders would be against it?

replies(2): >>21185355 #>>21185378 #
3. bearcobra ◴[07 Oct 19 20:04 UTC] No.21185355[source]▶
Unlike Google, Apple is hardware company and has a massive amount of manufacturing in China. It would be almost impossible for them to bail on that infrastructure.
replies(1): >>21185442 #
4. BinaryIdiot ◴[07 Oct 19 20:07 UTC] No.21185378[source]▶
> Sure he can. Google bailed on China once. Apple certainly has the money and talent to do the same.

Google didn't have much of any foothold into China when it dropped. It was also purely based on software which can be toggled off relatively easy (then you just have to wind down offices).

All of Apple's products require China to produce. All of them.

> Would he? Why do you assume that this would be bad for it share price, or that the majority of shareholders would be against it?

The majority of their manufacturing and assembly is in China. China is their big growth market. Not only would it tank the share price by cutting out their huge growth opportunity but it's completely within China's power to stop almost all of their production.

The stock market reflects what wallstreet things will grow. When you stagnate your share price drops (there is no reason to hang onto it if you won't become more profitable).

replies(1): >>21185463 #
5. reaperducer ◴[07 Oct 19 20:12 UTC] No.21185442{3}[source]▶
Not really. Apple just has to do it in phases. No one is suggesting that Apple leave China overnight.
6. reaperducer ◴[07 Oct 19 20:14 UTC] No.21185463{3}[source]▶
All of Apple's products require China to produce

Today. But maybe not tomorrow. India, Vietnam, Brazil, and a dozen other countries are more than willing to take on that production. Heck, most of Apple's contractors in China (think Foxconn) already have manufacturing in other countries.

replies(1): >>21186600 #
7. BinaryIdiot ◴[07 Oct 19 22:20 UTC] No.21186600{4}[source]▶
> Today. But maybe not tomorrow. India, Vietnam, Brazil, and a dozen other countries are more than willing to take on that production. Heck, most of Apple's contractors in China (think Foxconn) already have manufacturing in other countries.

That isn't an easy thing to do and it certainly wouldn't give Tim Cook any leverage. It would take them probably a decade to fully move their pipeline out of China and even if they did it, it would be very capital intensive so even if it was cheaper it would take quite some time to recoup those costs (and I'm not really convinced it would be cheaper overall but that's a separate exercise).