←back to thread

628 points nodea2345 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nvahalik ◴[] No.21125093[source]
> Imagine if the US suddenly had a dictator

This is why we have the second amendment. And the constitution as the thing to which office-holders swear allegiance to rather than to "the party" or "the president".

replies(26): >>21125127 #>>21125139 #>>21125892 #>>21126027 #>>21126073 #>>21126084 #>>21126204 #>>21126397 #>>21126398 #>>21126638 #>>21126890 #>>21126892 #>>21127286 #>>21127513 #>>21127874 #>>21127880 #>>21128227 #>>21128793 #>>21129412 #>>21129418 #>>21129526 #>>21129658 #>>21130063 #>>21130220 #>>21131181 #>>21131653 #
swarnie_[dead post] ◴[] No.21125127[source]
Non-American here, i never really understood your second amendment or how you cling to it in the modern age.

What are a couple of rednecks with assault rifles (which arguably they shouldn't be able to purchase anyway) going to do against semi-autonomy kill droids being flown from a bunker in the desert?

ericmay ◴[] No.21125154[source]
The same thing that people in Afghanistan did?

It's also not cool to characterize people who have assault rifles or support the 2nd amendment as rednecks. I'm certainly not one. It's actually kind of offensive to even use that term anyway if you ask me.

replies(4): >>21125187 #>>21125194 #>>21125893 #>>21128574 #
swarnie_ ◴[] No.21125194[source]
No offence intended, just a stereotypical image i go to when thinking about the US's gun culture and all the problems it brings.
replies(4): >>21125343 #>>21125423 #>>21125825 #>>21125866 #
swebs ◴[] No.21125423[source]
I think the problems are unrelated to gun ownership. If you were to plot the percent of gun ownership vs the crime rate among various states or even countries, you wouldn't find much of a correlation.
replies(4): >>21125800 #>>21125809 #>>21125864 #>>21125879 #
hanniabu ◴[] No.21125864[source]
> I think the problems are unrelated to gun ownership

Exactly, if the same logic for guns were used on other things then you'd have people up in arms saying nobody should be able to drive cars because of how many people kill others with them.

replies(1): >>21125999 #
admax88q[dead post] ◴[] No.21125999[source]
Lol are you seriously comparing cars to guns?

Guns have one primary purpose, to shoot things.

A car's primary purpose is not to hit things.

filoleg ◴[] No.21126812[source]
>guns have one purpose - shoot things

There is another one you are missing: deterring people from violence against other people, given the knowledge they might be carrying a gun. In a similar way to how nukes are actually used in 21st century.

replies(1): >>21128990 #
admax88q ◴[] No.21128990{3}[source]
Doesn't make the comparison between cars and guns any less stupid.
replies(1): >>21129250 #
1. filoleg ◴[] No.21129250{4}[source]
That one, I can definitely agree with.