←back to thread

628 points nodea2345 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.289s | source
Show context
program_whiz ◴[] No.21125050[source]
Sure, the kid was swinging at the officer, and I suppose that warrants the officer acting in self-defense. But another question is, what are the protesters supposed to do? The government has all the power, and can simply snuff out any resistence. If you just stand in the streets, they really don't care, they are going to take your freedom. Imagine if the US suddenly had a dictator that just decided they were going to take all property rights and freedoms like that -- I think taking to the streets, and even resorting to violence might be necessary (otherwise the powers-that-be have no reason to listen to a bunch of people standing in a street hundreds of miles away).
replies(21): >>21125109 #>>21125130 #>>21125159 #>>21125323 #>>21125359 #>>21125396 #>>21125728 #>>21125946 #>>21126113 #>>21126194 #>>21126243 #>>21126597 #>>21128682 #>>21129125 #>>21129256 #>>21129285 #>>21129663 #>>21130428 #>>21131160 #>>21131429 #>>21140974 #
exabrial[dead post] ◴[] No.21125946[source]
Sadly, right now a US presidential candidate, Beto O’Rourke, is promising to violently remove firearms from law abiding US Citizens.
1. tkifnn ◴[] No.21127254[source]
What's even sadder is that he cites an instance of the government murdering nonviolent protestors as a reason citizens should not have guns.

https://mobile.twitter.com/BetoORourke/status/11772741326748...