←back to thread

628 points nodea2345 | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.328s | source | bottom
Show context
nvahalik ◴[] No.21125093[source]
> Imagine if the US suddenly had a dictator

This is why we have the second amendment. And the constitution as the thing to which office-holders swear allegiance to rather than to "the party" or "the president".

replies(26): >>21125127 #>>21125139 #>>21125892 #>>21126027 #>>21126073 #>>21126084 #>>21126204 #>>21126397 #>>21126398 #>>21126638 #>>21126890 #>>21126892 #>>21127286 #>>21127513 #>>21127874 #>>21127880 #>>21128227 #>>21128793 #>>21129412 #>>21129418 #>>21129526 #>>21129658 #>>21130063 #>>21130220 #>>21131181 #>>21131653 #
1. emptysongglass ◴[] No.21126027[source]
This is absurd. Any chance a rebellious citizenry had armed to the teeth evaporated with standing armies.

Gun owners of the US cling to this ideal even while experiencing the worst spate of mass shootings in its history. There is no solution to this other than disarming.

replies(3): >>21126077 #>>21126292 #>>21126347 #
2. bhupy ◴[] No.21126077[source]
The US (with its standing army) has been at war in the Middle East for nearly 2 decades now with insurgents.

The argument is not that a rebellious citizenry will necessarily win a war, it's that it will draw out a bloody civil war so long and so expensive as to be a form of mutually assured destruction, the risk of which acts as a check in and of itself.

3. Clubber ◴[] No.21126292[source]
[flagged]
replies(3): >>21126350 #>>21126375 #>>21132110 #
4. kaolti ◴[] No.21126347[source]
Is it really absurd? What is absurd about you having the right to protect yourself? You seem to be saying "I can't protect myself anyway, so let's not allow anyone else to try either."

Disarming is a solution. If everyone would come together as one and hand their weapons in because THEY wanted to.

Do you really think forcibly trying to take guns from people is a solution? Damn, talk about absurd.

5. wbronitsky ◴[] No.21126350[source]
Wow, what a needless, toxic comment that attacks a person when it could easily attack an idea. It is amazing to me how prolific these types of arguments have become on this platform. I don’t understand why we continue to push arguments that equate to “you disagree with me and therefore are an idiot who cannot see what is right in front of them”
6. josephdviviano ◴[] No.21126375[source]
By this logic, do you think all of the other western democracies that do not have a right to bear arms are at risk of producing a Stalin?
replies(1): >>21132559 #
7. dang ◴[] No.21132110[source]
Breaking the site guidelines like this will get you banned on HN regardless of how wrong another commenter is or you feel they are. Would you please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here? We've had to ask you this more than once before.

It can be helpful to remember that when you go way out of bounds like this, you discredit the position you're arguing for. Assuming you're right, that means you're discrediting the truth, which helps no one.

replies(1): >>21132566 #
8. Clubber ◴[] No.21132559{3}[source]
Absolutely, whether internally or externally. Many of them got a Hitler in the early 1940s and could have very well gotten the actual Stalin in the late 1940s. Crimea and Georgia got a Putin not long ago, but the rest of Ukraine managed to fight him off for now it seems. Looks like Hong Kong is about to get a Xi. It happens all the time, all over the world and has for all of civilization.
9. Clubber ◴[] No.21132566{3}[source]
Ya sorry, I get excited.