> Imagine if the US suddenly had a dictator
This is why we have the second amendment. And the constitution as the thing to which office-holders swear allegiance to rather than to "the party" or "the president".
replies(26):
This is why we have the second amendment. And the constitution as the thing to which office-holders swear allegiance to rather than to "the party" or "the president".
What are a couple of rednecks with assault rifles (which arguably they shouldn't be able to purchase anyway) going to do against semi-autonomy kill droids being flown from a bunker in the desert?
If anything the war in Afghanistan has proven that technology is no match for resilience and grit.
The Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan and the illegitimate communist government was ousted right?
If the US had the desire and stomach to wage total war against the people of Afghanistan (gladly we do not), there would not be a lingering quagmire.
The US supported the anti-communist opposition, and the Soviets withdrew and Afghanistan returned to democratic elections.
Like all things politics, its all how you spin it. Perhaps the real loss was what happened after the US spent over $1T to spread democracy in Afghanistan, they began electing the Taliban as their democratic leaders, and we ultimately went to war against the Taliban costing even more. That firmly established the US believes in democracy so long as we also support the party that wins the elections.
Even the previous US civil war isn't a great example because that was a regional war before modern technology. You could have guerilla forces hiding out in southern backwaters that the Union wasn't familiar with. It would be much harder to do that in a country as massively surveilled as the modern US.
These wars would not be the same, and this represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the scope of the conflict.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_partisans
>The partisans made significant contributions to the war by frustrating German plans to exploit occupied Soviet territories economically, gave considerable help to the Soviet Army by conducting systematic strikes against Germany's rear communication network, disseminated political work among the local population by publishing newspapers and leaflets, and succeeded in creating and maintaining a feeling of insecurity among German forces.[1]
FYI we spent over $1T to spread democracy in Afghanistan pre-2001.
Personally, I'd expect the main skirmishes in a US civil war to be factions of the military fighting against each other.
It's not really technology holding us back, in either situation. Fear the day technology is good enough that the few can act without the restraint of civilization.
It would be like equating WWI Germany with WWII Nazi Germany...but who knows, maybe people do that.