←back to thread

1116 points whatok | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ryanchankh ◴[] No.20740736[source]
HongKonger here. I have some friends in China posting similar anti-protest posts on WeChat social media. It's like the news they read has a completely different story than what it's being told in legitimate new sources. The problem of fake news does become very apparent, and I hope people in China can eventually gain awareness or at least start to question the validity of their news sources.
replies(10): >>20740852 #>>20740950 #>>20741085 #>>20741418 #>>20741796 #>>20741819 #>>20742574 #>>20742846 #>>20742925 #>>20743748 #
kevin_b_er ◴[] No.20741085[source]
When the fake news is generated and controlled by a government entity, I think the better term is "propaganda".
replies(2): >>20741196 #>>20741509 #
guerrilla ◴[] No.20741196[source]
It seems unreasonable to restrict the term propaganda to government since any organization can produce propaganda, i.e. "information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause or point of view."
replies(2): >>20741304 #>>20741734 #
brightball ◴[] No.20741304[source]
If it's not from the government, we call it marketing. :-)
replies(2): >>20741357 #>>20741371 #
guerrilla ◴[] No.20741357[source]
This is incorrect. Marketing is not necessarily used to promote political change. There are plenty of examples of propaganda in for-proft and non-profit (yet non-state) media which is clearly propaganda and not marketing simultaneously.
replies(3): >>20741530 #>>20741942 #>>20742962 #
1. chrischen ◴[] No.20742962[source]
Tell that to the political facebook ad companies.