←back to thread

1116 points whatok | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mortenjorck ◴[] No.20740690[source]
The elephant left standing in the room is not the spam and bot accounts, but the official, state-actor accounts such as Xinhua News that pay for promoted tweets carrying the same message.

Granted this is likely beyond the scope of Twitter’s safety team, but this completely sidesteps the issues raised here: https://techcrunch.com/2019/08/19/twitter-is-blocked-in-chin...

replies(2): >>20740717 #>>20740809 #
martey ◴[] No.20740717[source]
See https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2019/advertisi..., which was posted to the Twitter blog at approximately the same time as this post.
replies(3): >>20740858 #>>20740952 #>>20742546 #
CobrastanJorji ◴[] No.20740952[source]
So, wait...is the BBC no longer allowed to advertise upcoming shows on Twitter?
replies(2): >>20741116 #>>20741203 #
1. tareqak ◴[] No.20741203[source]
I was confused about this part too, but that link does have this:

> This policy will not apply to taxpayer-funded entities, including independent public broadcasters.

Britain's BBC, Canada's CBC, and the US PBS should be covered by that.

Actually, what's to stop China from making their news agency tax-payer funded to take advantage of this exception?

replies(2): >>20741670 #>>20743975 #
2. noarchy ◴[] No.20741670[source]
How about state media that is already taxpayer-funded? Do they really get an exception here?
replies(1): >>20742069 #
3. tareqak ◴[] No.20742069[source]
The quote in my comment has "independent public broadcasters". I think they will depend on third parties in order to make that determination.
replies(1): >>20742997 #
4. noarchy ◴[] No.20742997{3}[source]
That was my assumption as well. I can't imagine they'd put the North Korean state broadcasters on the same level as BBC or CBC.
5. ◴[] No.20743975[source]