←back to thread

132 points AndrewBissell | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.284s | source
Show context
binarymax ◴[] No.20575710[source]
An independent activist journalist has been digging into the case and has come up with some interesting and alarming connections and history. Worth a read: https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2019/07/08/the-jeffrey-epstein...
replies(5): >>20575908 #>>20575913 #>>20576035 #>>20576439 #>>20576870 #
bitxbitxbitcoin ◴[] No.20575908[source]
I find it interesting that both the words independent and activist had to be brought out to qualify the wonderful journalism from Michael Krieger. Wasn't there a time when it was somewhat assumed that journalists were both independent and activists to some extent?

Thanks for sharing the link!

replies(5): >>20575964 #>>20575994 #>>20576027 #>>20576031 #>>20576077 #
burkaman ◴[] No.20575994[source]
No? Independent is unusual, most journalists work for an organization. Activist is also unusual and probably somewhat controversial; I'm guessing many journalists would say their job is to be objective, not to be an activist.
replies(1): >>20576661 #
1. luckylion ◴[] No.20576661[source]
I find activist refreshingly honest. I've found that you can read a pretty clear agenda from most writers when you read enough from them - in what they report, but mostly in what they do not report. They are activists, but they claim not to be, because that claim makes their activism more powerful.