Most active commenters
  • pmarreck(4)

←back to thread

Civic honesty around the globe

(science.sciencemag.org)
209 points ojosilva | 13 comments | | HN request time: 0.423s | source | bottom
1. pmarreck ◴[] No.20236798[source]
(Sarcastic comment about China here removed)
replies(5): >>20236814 #>>20236815 #>>20236858 #>>20236882 #>>20236964 #
2. komali2 ◴[] No.20236814[source]
>bastion of religious freedom

Er, did I miss something in the article? What's that got to do with anything?

replies(1): >>20237393 #
3. kadendogthing ◴[] No.20236815[source]
> although the U.S.'s position is concerning

It's certainly not surprising.

>especially as a bastion of religious freedom

I would not use the word bastion here. Maybe technically it has religious freedom in code, but in practice it tends to be quite poor.

4. ppod ◴[] No.20236858[source]
What is it about Chinese society that makes you say that? Not having a go here, I legitimately know nothing about it. If stranger-trust is so low, what societal branches does trust hang on? Is it family, business, political, local..? Is it mediated through technology like WeChat?
replies(3): >>20236952 #>>20236983 #>>20237048 #
5. crypt1d ◴[] No.20236882[source]
the only non-shocking thing here is an American trying to claim moral superiority over the rest of the world. :)
replies(2): >>20236976 #>>20237405 #
6. Symmetry ◴[] No.20236952[source]
There were a lot of reports in the Chinese news a while ago about people being taken in by scammers that pretended to be injured, had the mark help them, and then claimed that the mark's help proved they had a guilty conscious and was responsible and owed them monetary reparations.

This sort of came to a head when a small child was run over and many pedestrians passed without helping.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Wang_Yue

So I'm imagining many Chinese people might be reluctant to return a wallet in case it turns out to be some sort of scam.

7. dang ◴[] No.20236964[source]
Nationalistic flamebait is not allowed on HN. We ban accounts that post like this, so please don't.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>20237373 #
8. dang ◴[] No.20236976[source]
Please don't post flamewar comments here, even when someone else has posted flamebait.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

9. Maximus9000 ◴[] No.20236983[source]
The impression I've got is that the Chinese are notorious for cheating. When competing against a billion other people, you need an edge.

https://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/06/heres-the-...

10. president ◴[] No.20237048[source]
Family-first. If you're not family, you're either an enemy or an opportunity.
11. pmarreck ◴[] No.20237373[source]
Ooof. I'm sorry. Noted.
12. pmarreck ◴[] No.20237393[source]
A sarcastic note by me about the idea of inherent religious goodness
13. pmarreck ◴[] No.20237405[source]
Touché.

Edited my comment anyway, because I don't want my main account banned from here.