←back to thread

1318 points xvector | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.253s | source
Show context
Grue3 ◴[] No.19825053[source]
What kind of idiot thought that the add-ons I have personally installed on my browser need to have a capability to be remotely disabled despite literally nothing being changed.

This is absolutely inexcusable. I want to see everyone being responsible for this "verified add-ons" fiasco fired from the team (after they roll it back of course).

replies(7): >>19825074 #>>19825084 #>>19825094 #>>19825120 #>>19825147 #>>19825255 #>>19825358 #
swalladge ◴[] No.19825074[source]
Exactly. If me/firefox has verified the signature (or approved the download) when downloading or updating the addon, that should be all that's necessary. Why does firefox have to check signatures constantly?
replies(2): >>19825114 #>>19825160 #
egwor ◴[] No.19825114[source]
in case it was revoked? Seems fairly reasonable approach
replies(1): >>19825148 #
1. TeMPOraL ◴[] No.19825148[source]
Disabling with no option of user override is not reasonable. It only creates unnecessary dependency on third parties.

When product recalls happen, the manufacturer isn't taking your product away by force.