←back to thread

1318 points xvector | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
Grue3 ◴[] No.19825053[source]
What kind of idiot thought that the add-ons I have personally installed on my browser need to have a capability to be remotely disabled despite literally nothing being changed.

This is absolutely inexcusable. I want to see everyone being responsible for this "verified add-ons" fiasco fired from the team (after they roll it back of course).

replies(7): >>19825074 #>>19825084 #>>19825094 #>>19825120 #>>19825147 #>>19825255 #>>19825358 #
1. founderling ◴[] No.19825084[source]

    remotely disabled
Were they really remotely disabled? That would mean somebody out there pushed a button and made your add-ons go poof.

As I understand it, the browser checks the certificate of add-ons at some point (on startup? on an interval?) and only uses signed ones. And since signatures are date restricted, previously valid signatures can become invalid.

I'm not 100% sure if this really is the mechanism. Would be interesting to hear from someone in the know.