←back to thread

1318 points xvector | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
needle0 ◴[] No.19823806[source]
I’ll still keep using Firefox since I recognize the importance of browser diversity and the hazards of a Chrome monoculture (that and vertical tabs), but, yikes.

Still, this type of oversight seems all too common even in large companies. I remember several cases from Fortune 500 companies in the past few years alone. What would be a good way to automate checking for them? Has anyone developed a tool designed specifically to avoid certificate expiry disasters?

replies(18): >>19823825 #>>19823829 #>>19823831 #>>19823840 #>>19823848 #>>19823861 #>>19823913 #>>19823994 #>>19824009 #>>19824223 #>>19824243 #>>19824298 #>>19824668 #>>19824724 #>>19824795 #>>19824840 #>>19824927 #>>19825103 #
revvx ◴[] No.19823994[source]
> Still, this type of oversight seems all too common even in large companies. (...) Has anyone developed a tool designed specifically to avoid certificate expiry disasters?

LetsEncrypt renewal is supposed to be automated. [1]

I know of a company that hosted blogs for thousands of customers. They used LetsEncrypt, but the CTO considered automatic renewals a possible security risk, so they did it manually. Problem is, the expiration happened in a weekend and they "forgot" to update the certificates before that. Suffice to say that the next Monday wasn't pleasant. They automated after that.

[1] https://letsencrypt.org/about/

replies(9): >>19824056 #>>19824264 #>>19824303 #>>19824403 #>>19824729 #>>19824926 #>>19825434 #>>19825826 #>>19826191 #
n42 ◴[] No.19824403[source]
Just curious, are you talking about Webflow? Because I had to hunt down and make sure our Let's Encrypt auto renewal was working until I realized the certificate was served by them. They wait until the last 12 hours to renew the certificate. I have no idea what type of rationalization would lead to that decision.
replies(3): >>19824727 #>>19824834 #>>19826811 #
tass ◴[] No.19824727[source]
90 days is 4 times a year. 60 is 6 times, 50% more expensive when you’re paying someone to perform the task.
replies(1): >>19824768 #
n42 ◴[] No.19824768[source]
I had the same thought, but I still find that absurd. Say they host 500,000 websites with HTTPS. 1,000,000 renewals they save spread across the year, roughly 2 renewals a minute. That is pennies. A t2.medium could handle that type of load increase
replies(1): >>19824806 #
albru123 ◴[] No.19824806[source]
A bit OT, but what's up with this usage of Amazon EC2 tiers as a unit of computational power?
replies(2): >>19825023 #>>19825079 #
1. rickycook ◴[] No.19825079[source]
i think it’s a combined “fixed cost” rather than just computational power... like you could do it with x, thus it should cost at most y

similar to saying that you could do it with a raspberry pi