Edit: wow, downvotes? Care to explain what I'm missing?
Edit: wow, downvotes? Care to explain what I'm missing?
Without timestamping the expired cert always would have caused problems, even if it was replaced early and correctly: Every add-on would still need to be signed again with the new replacement certificate and shipped to all users. It's not as easy as just replacing the certificate on some server.
Well, this is still what has to happen: replace the certificate, ship that new certificate[1], re-sign every add-on, ship every add-on to every user.
Now, in order to ship new versions of the add-ons, you probably will have to bump the add-on version numbers as well. Which can have further unintended consequences.
[1] Incorrect, see blow; it is my understanding that the certificate in question is baked into the browser itself, with no way to push updates just for the certificate remotely other than shipping an entire new Firefox build. Well 6 new builds: esr, stable, dev, beta, nightly, unbranded. Gonna be a fun night for a lot of mozilla folks... Well, a night is not gonna be enough...
I might be wrong tho, and misunderstood something.
EDIT I was wrong (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19824520), the expired cert is not baked into the browser, just into the add-on package files. No need for new Firefox binaries, after all. Still, they have to resign all add-ons and ship new versions.