←back to thread

1318 points xvector | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Wowfunhappy ◴[] No.19823890[source]
This is why users need to be in control of their own computers. Why can't I tell my copy of Firefox to ignore the certificate? Why can't I sign my own extensions?

Mistakes happen, it's okay. But users should be empowered to work around them.

replies(9): >>19823918 #>>19823919 #>>19823921 #>>19823930 #>>19824013 #>>19824265 #>>19824275 #>>19824334 #>>19824438 #
ehsankia ◴[] No.19823919[source]
> Why can't I tell my copy of Firefox to ignore the certificate? Why can't I sign my own extensions?

The issue is that if you leave any sort of lever that reduces security, it will be abused by bad actors. This is why browsers are having ever decreasing ways to bypass security and have full access. It is annoying, but at the end of the day, protecting 99.999% of the users trumps what us power users want.

replies(4): >>19823956 #>>19823992 #>>19824076 #>>19825643 #
Wowfunhappy ◴[] No.19824076[source]
Consider the recent news stories about the Boeing 737 Max. Boeing added an automatic system to an airplane, and then didn't give users (the pilots) a way to disable that system. This worked out great while the automatic system is working properly. When the system broke, well, we all know what happened.

If we're going to assume that software is right and the user is wrong 100% of the time, then the software needs to actually be right 100% of the time. Unfortunately, our software isn't that robust, and it never will be.

replies(2): >>19824154 #>>19824376 #
yazzoo7 ◴[] No.19824154[source]
You mean the 737Max?
replies(1): >>19824163 #
1. Wowfunhappy ◴[] No.19824163[source]
Yes, that was stupid. Edit now, thank you.