←back to thread

142 points mzs | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.225s | source
Show context
nkkollaw ◴[] No.19401784[source]
Can we really trust BuzzFeed with any kind of reporting?

This might or might not be true, but the fact that reality mirrors what BuzzFeed says is purely coincidental.

replies(1): >>19402058 #
freehunter ◴[] No.19402058[source]
You mean can we trust the Pulitzer Prize winning staff of Buzzfeed News or can we trust the two-time Pulitzer Prize finalist organization Buzzfeed News?

Because I don't know if you know this, but many members of the staff of Buzzfeed News have won Pulitzer Prizes and the organization was a finalist in both 2017 and 2018. The accuracy of their reporting is no more suspect than any other well-respected media organization.

replies(1): >>19402276 #
nkkollaw ◴[] No.19402276[source]
Yes. That actually makes me wonder about the Pulitzer Prize, if what you're saying is true.

From https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed/: "overall, we rate Buzzfeed Left-Center Biased due to story selection that tends to favor the left and Mixed for factual reporting based on poor sourcing and a few failed fact checks.".

They're also selling their own brand of kitchenware if you're not aware of it (see https://www.buzzfeed.com/samanthawieder/tasty-kitchenware-wa...), which is a perfect indication that not even them believe their journalism will get them anywhere.

They're a biased, failing enterprise that spins news to cause outrage and get a few clicks.

Someone at BuzzFeed won a Pulitzer Prize..? That doesn't mean that BuzzFeed's journalists don't generally spend the whole day writing listicles or biased articles to try to avoid bankruptcy.

The author--Jane Lytvynenko--has bright red hair and might identify herself with news reporter, but has no track record and not even a LinkedIn profile. Her tweets read like "Hello happy Thursday here's a selection of memes from a pro-Bernier channel plz enjoy". I mean, "plz"? Give me a break.

replies(1): >>19404116 #
24gttghh ◴[] No.19404116[source]
>The author--Jane Lytvynenko--has bright red hair and might identify herself with news reporter,

Is this some kind of ad-hominem attack? I don't see how it is necessary.

replies(1): >>19406781 #
nkkollaw ◴[] No.19406781[source]
It's not, I'm just saying that journalists usually look decent to inspire trust, while she has bright red hair and uses "plz" instead of "please" in her tweets.
replies(1): >>19441467 #
1. 24gttghh ◴[] No.19441467[source]
And I reiterate that you are using ad-hominem and no-true-scotsman attacks to discredit someone instead of using their words or actions. Btw her hair looks a pretty normal shade of red/brown in all but one google image search result...