←back to thread

90 points matt_d | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
userbinator ◴[] No.19334750[source]
Our microarchitecture achieves 2.7 times the per-clock performance of a performance-tuned Nios II/f, Alteraâ s fastest (RISC-like, single-issue, pipelined) soft processor, and 0.8 times the frequency, for a total performance improvement of 2.2 times.

It'd be very interesting to compare this to RISC-V.

replies(2): >>19334809 #>>19335267 #
1. pcwalton ◴[] No.19334809[source]
Note that this the Nios II/f is an in-order CPU, while this is a superscalar CPU. A more relevant benchmark would be the superscalar dual-issue ARM Cortex-A9, illustrated in figure 13.4. It's about the same performance as that one if you average all the benchmarks.

In theory, RISC-V should be at about the same performance as ARMv8 (note that Cortex-A9 is ARMv7): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15343287

replies(1): >>19335276 #
2. snvzz ◴[] No.19335276[source]
>In theory, RISC-V should be at about the same performance as ARMv8

Or POWER9, the cpu with the fastest IPC. And it's RISC.

There's nothing to prevent RISC-V ISA from getting high performance implementations.