←back to thread

1293 points rmason | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.448s | source
Show context
socrates1998 ◴[] No.19323322[source]
Anecdotally, I work with teenagers and none of them have a Facebook pages. It's viewed as a place for old people and parents.

For me personally, it's almost impossible to deal with. Way too many political posts from my friends and family.

It's probably best use for me is local events and an occasional major event from a friend/family member.

Still, I find myself going there less and less.

From a small business standpoint, it's just not worth the time, effort and money to advertise there. It's much more effective to focus on getting referrals with my current clients.

I really wish there was a paid social media service that everyone used. I would gladly pay $5-$10 a month for something that didn't sell my data.

replies(15): >>19323410 #>>19323503 #>>19323591 #>>19323620 #>>19323626 #>>19323637 #>>19323716 #>>19323721 #>>19324033 #>>19324064 #>>19324090 #>>19324919 #>>19325055 #>>19326803 #>>19329622 #
ilovecaching ◴[] No.19323721[source]
The problem with the non ad driven model is that to you 5$ might be nothing, but some people 5$ is an impossible sum of money to spend a month on entertainment. Ads allow companies to offer first world products to customers who could desperately use technology to help them connect and trade in their local communities.

I think the discussion on privacy and ad based platforms should really be orthogonal.

replies(3): >>19324052 #>>19324290 #>>19328563 #
1. Firadeoclus ◴[] No.19328563[source]
The value of ads is related to the spending power of those advertised to. If $5 is an impossible sum to spend for a user, advertising to them is worth very little as well.
replies(1): >>19330789 #
2. ilovecaching ◴[] No.19330789[source]
The idea behind Facebook isn't to sell ads, it's to build a social platform for everyone. Sure, those people aren't spending a ton of money yet, but they still deserve to have access to the internet and major services.