←back to thread

1293 points rmason | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
peteretep ◴[] No.19325816[source]
By far the biggest factor that had me stopping checking Facebook, and indeed LinkedIn, is number of utterly fictitious notifications they generate. There was a time a few years back when that red dot made me drop everything to check FB, but these days it’ll be some completely bullshit message they’ve made a notification out of. Feels like they got greedy for my attention and killed the golden goose there. I check it about once a day now, and in the browser not the app. If the notifications were still meaningful I’d probably still have the app and all the metadata that sent them.
replies(31): >>19325841 #>>19325847 #>>19325871 #>>19325928 #>>19325958 #>>19326311 #>>19326386 #>>19326460 #>>19326491 #>>19326605 #>>19326750 #>>19326766 #>>19326773 #>>19326805 #>>19326833 #>>19327096 #>>19327133 #>>19327250 #>>19327442 #>>19327480 #>>19328595 #>>19328839 #>>19329039 #>>19329215 #>>19330091 #>>19330285 #>>19331090 #>>19332010 #>>19332471 #>>19336770 #>>19337703 #
Matheus28 ◴[] No.19325847[source]
It really feels like some companies like Facebook are flying blind by using A/B testing everywhere and ignoring the long term effects of the changes they do.
replies(4): >>19326158 #>>19326210 #>>19326938 #>>19326940 #
arethuza ◴[] No.19326938[source]
Isn't A/B testing pretty much going to behave like a steepest ascent hill climbing? At each micro decision point you take what looks like the 'best' option but that means you can get stuck in local maxima?
replies(4): >>19327143 #>>19327933 #>>19327978 #>>19332210 #
Yhippa ◴[] No.19327933[source]
This is interesting but I don't think I fully understand. Do you mind dumbing it down for me?
replies(2): >>19328003 #>>19331260 #
1. girmad ◴[] No.19328003{3}[source]
Global vs local maximum. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxima_and_minima

Related: what's the best for one part of the system, may not be the best for the entire system.